It needs to sweep as many dust votes as possible (to Hive users having enough dust sweeping balance), hopefully without draining its Voting Power. 🤓
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It needs to sweep as many dust votes as possible (to Hive users having enough dust sweeping balance), hopefully without draining its Voting Power. 🤓
got it brother
I got toldsweep all my outgoing (as well as incoming) dust votes (despite having enough balance), both I and my favorite authors benefit from my dust votes (without relying much on dust collecting services). 🤓 by @savvyplayer to simply curate the posts (instead of comments) of Hive authors I like to engage with, so that even if the #dustsweeper bot doesn't
!HUG
I sent 1.0 HUG
(1/3)Dear @theringmaster, you just got hugged. on behalf of @savvytester.
That would be a perfect thing to doz sometimes the authors prefer the Upvote on their blog instead, one of my friends told me to save my Upvotes on his comment for his blog instead
That's not an uncommondust-collecting service. 🤓 preference for maximizing author/curator rewards, especially by Hive users who use neither the #dustsweeper or #dustbunny
!WINEX !LUV
Absolutely right I think that's better
If the curator can vote significantly above $0.02 per vote, then he or she is free to vote on comments instead of posts without losing the value of the votes to dust. 🤓
!WEED !BEER
Oh ok that's pretty nice one brother... I'm close to that point so perhaps I might start the dust sweeper stuff