No essentially unless you are awake enough to know a difference. Edicted in his statement above just ran down exactly what the problem is, it's people using information published then gleaning it to fit a narrative. No the insurance company did not say it was high payouts to those 64 retired, he said it's 18 to 64 working age people. So him being on the left they want that to fit in the narrative that it's just old comorbidity filled people dying instead of the right narrative claim that people are dying as the result of an experimental vaccine. So you see how that plays out and why it would be hard to keep up with.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: