I was talking with a friend yesterday who was saying how Axie Infinity has been banning players and game assets for breaching the rules, like having multiple accounts. I don't know much about all of this, but he was also saying that many of the people who are responsible for making it as popular as it is as a play-to-earn game, are now ironically, struggling to earn on it.
But, this is pretty much par for the course for centralized businesses to do, especially in this day and age. Firstly, in order to get popular it means "going viral" and ultimately, the easiest way to do this is to give stuff away for free and encourage normal people to join and use. Once there is enough users embedded in however, then it is possible to close the gateways of earning to most people and instead, centralize who gets what.
We have seen this many times and on pretty much every popular platform where there is some potential to earn and especially those that rely on advertising for their income. Remember getting personal invites to get a Gmail account? What about invites to Facebook? Twitter? Instagram?
Essentially, what they are doing is piggybacking their business model on the masses and then once they are able to monetize adequately, they can then pick and choose who actually gets monetized. This gives them an incredible amount of power over how their platform and once people are locked into a particular platform, it is impossible to move to another without a huge amount of loss of income, followers and through new setup costs. Look at the famous people who have been banned from the big platforms for having controversial views and ask - where are they now?
At some point though, we are going to have to take responsibility for ourselves and say, enough is enough. What this means is that rather than relying on the oh so convenient centralized platforms, we will start taking ownership of rather inconvenient decentralized platforms. This inconvenience doesn't have to be there always of course, it is just a stop on the road while we get ourselves sorted, enough people involved, financial backing and innovation to improve the experiences.
A lot of people seemingly don't remember even the mid-90s internet and how impractical it was at times. They don't remember waiting for images to load a bar at a time, downloads coming in at fractions of kb a second and the trial and tribulations of "ecommerce" sites. Now, everyone is used to just walking around with a computer in their pocket and an internet connection that has more bandwidth than my university had - for the entire university. They had a 1.5Mbs T1 server, which is 20x faster than a 56k modem, but 100x slower than my phone connection.
Convenience is a killer for the will to make change, which is why it is so difficult to break the stranglehold on so many of the large companies now, especially the ones that collect our data and use it to create even more convenient products. They are able to see what is happening across society and develop for us, before we even know we want it and then, use the channels they control to drive their latest products into society, making it feel like it is a natural process.
People seem to love the suggestions they get from Netflix, without seeing that what is actually happening is that they are being nudged into loving what is suggested. It isn't just coming through Netflix either, the messaging is being reverberated across all popular platforms and doubled-down upon through the mainstream media outlets too, making it feel like everyone is already onboard and we are missing out if we don't take part too.
Even many people here who are literally earning from their activity, still can't bring htemselves to give up on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and TikTok type platforms because, that is where everyone else is. See the issue? We support them too, because for now at least, we have to. But, the longer we ew do, the more we will have to because they will continually use convenience to keep us present. change is just too hard, especially after we have spent the better part of two decades building a presence on some of these platforms - even though it is not ours at all.
And this is an interesting thing in regards to Axie Infinity that I didn't know - the players don't own the assets. If those who control the game are just going to wholesale ban players and the tokens they hold, what is the point of owning it at all? While it might be "on a blockchain" this has nothing to do with a decentralized environment or ownership, it is bullshit. If Splinterlands were to start banning assets and players that they do not like, I would very quickly opt-out of the project.
But, this is the thing, as we can see from Hive, it isn't easy or convenient, largely because everyone has a different idea of what the space means. When there is a shared reward pool for example and everyone has a different belief in how it should be shared, there will be conflict. Decentralization is hard, which is why Splinterlands isn't actually decentralized and they essentially could make similar moves to Axie - but if they do, what then?
Rather than just impose "martial law" on the game, they try to build the game to give freedom to the players who own the assets. If you want to run a bot that is fine, but they might make some changes that make it less lucrative. If you want to rent all your cards out that is fine, but you aren't going to get any reward cards for free, you have to play. Whatever it is, Splinterlands seems to be playing the harder game, even though it would be far easier to just do what all the other platforms do and, force their will.
I don't know if it will always be this way, but at least for now, I think that because splinterlands has been born with decentralization and freedom in mind, there is more chance that it will be better for the players in the long term and give far more freedom to those who do actually own the assets, than the centralized platforms - who whenever it is convenient for them, wield their power in the name of more profit.
Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I thought the AXIE assets were like CryptoKitties - NFTs that you can trade freely?
Are they really centralised?
They are basically worthless if they are.
Seems so. If they are getting banned. Apparently a week or so ago, 20k odd were banned.
I did notice Marianne from Splinterlands posting about some of hers getting banned come to think of it.
I bought a CryptoKitty back in the day, but hate using the ETH blockchain so much that I don't bother even checking or trying to sell it. Maybe if they leave the scam ETH chain to something more like BSC I'll sell that Kitty.
Oh I've got some kitties, but yes it's also pointless selling them given the fees!
Fees are outrageous. Had to move some of my funds to MetaMask for a project I was interested in and moved 0.1 ETH. 58$ fees. It makes me want to puke.
Is the kitty worth selling given the fees? I never got into them - but had a look a month or so ago for a post to see the activity - it is very low.
Axie is a fraud!
It is engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct by pretending to be a blockchain game when in fact it has none of the attributes that make something a true blockchain game.
In particular if players don't own assets and can be banned by a centralised authority then it is just another centralised game masquerading as a decentralised one.
It definitely doesn't seem like they care about the ownership model at all. Just another BS project cashing in.
Let's hope, Chifibots takes Axies place in the near future :O)
Wait until someone builds an open-source game that also uses Splinterlands assets and tokens! ;)
Community controlled, layered earning like we see with blogging on multiple front-ends.
The future is going to be wild.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I think this is what would make things interesting and I reckon, it will happen soon enough. Will it be able to compete with the main? That is the game! :D
It is definitely going to be an interesting future.
I have often thought about this and came to the conclusion that perhaps change is just too hard. Then again, if we continually give our time and effort to platforms where we feel mistreated then perhaps it needs to be handled in the same way and with the same seriousness bad habits are tackled
People are addicts and perhaps the most addictive behavior is doing the comfortable to do thing.
Truer words have never been spoken. Hundreds of revolutions were cancelled throughout history due to full stomachs, filled by dictators and monarchs.
I also visit both Facebook and Instagram once in a day, I can say that I haven't left them completely yet. However, I don't share on those platforms, just watch the people who are not aware of HIVE. Right, change is hard, it is really hard to bring those people here, but the change somehow has started.
It is funny these days, many don't share, just watch. We have created a world of voyeurs.
It's funny, I also noticed that, no activity in web 2.0, just contemplation of what's going on, in small portions...)
yep. It used to be a place where people would dump their lives, now it is just another consumer channel. no different than TV.
I never really got into Axie thankfully, though I do know some people are all about it. Glad I didn't venture into it, with fees and all that crazy shit. Now they are banning and seizing peoples assets? Yeah no thanks lol. Are they controlled by ol' Zuck I wonder? Seems like it! Taking a part of his playbook.
Glad to say that Hive is my only platform besides a meme app I have on my phone. I guess Discord may count too but I don't spend a fraction of my time on there that I do on Hive.
Some people love the central control, thinking and doing things on your own is so overrated!
It is the same for all of these platforms. They rope people in under the guise of some kind of freedom of use, and once popular, they start limiting freedoms. People complain about Hive, but it is doing pretty well at approaching a very hard problem.
Interesting. Fist they said you can make like extra accounts and send a team of 3 axies to that account and kind of renting it, those are the scholarships, and there are serious bussinesses in Asia doing this, and now they say you cannot. Not cool, we should promote Splinterlands and its renting system as alternative, to let everyone forgot axie. *wink
I don't know much about Axie, but I have heard there are some very annoyed people who have put a lot of time and effort in.
I agree - I think that at least in terms of what is likely, Splinterlands is a far healthier ecosystem in terms of ownership.
The first alarm bell was when the users increased by x10, and they decreased rewards twice in a month. Halved them twice.
This was the best-written post I've ever read on HIVE. You well earned my follow and lots of HIVE today sir! I like how you didn't even do a Splinterlands referral.
Why would I do a Splinterlands referral? :D
Oh - I could make some money from it! - I have never used my referral link.
Funnily, when I joined six months ago, the people who convinced me didn't give a referral - if they had, it would have been a pretty decent income for them! :D
It's not like you're going to get rich from referring people, but it comes in handy when you just need a card or two when leveling up and you've earned some credits. All my friends I've signed up have gone straight to Splinterlands.com so I missed out on those 5 percent lifetime credits.
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the person sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
THanks :)
Wired though🤔🤔🤔
Wired what?
Congratulations @tarazkp! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
Your next target is to reach 92000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Check out the last post from @hivebuzz: