It's great that you provided links and references to allow readers to figure out that you are using @dalz's images and are expanding on his report.
However, I am curious as to why you did not give him more direct credit.
Maybe he does not want to be tagged or mentioned? Or maybe it was simply an oversight? Or maybe you prefer to not tag people directly?
Or maybe you think semi-automated reports should not be over-rewarded, and you choose to not promote rather than downvote (an approach I can certainly understand and respect).
I would not have even realized those images were not your own except that I immediately recognized them, because I regularly follow @dalz and had read his report last night. Maybe I am making something out of nothing here. It just caught my attention and it seemed (to me) that direct attribution would have been mutually beneficial in this instance.