Damn it. This is kinda between the devil and the deep blue sea. Ethics demand that he keeps silent while morals demand that he reveals the murderer. If he's later found out to be hoarding information about the murderer, he might be charged for obstructing justice, I don't know if the oath of ethics would be enough to vindicate him.
Too much, right?
He is between a rock and a hard place.
Let's hope he does the right thing in the end. But the question would be, the right thing for whom?
Thanks for reading me. Regards ;)
It was a pleasure. AN enjoyable read
It was a pleasure. AN enjoyable read