RE: Cross-addressing cross-posting

[crypto.piotr]

Dear @tarazkp

Cross-posting seem to be another trendy topic lately. I've found your post thanks to @oneray. Thank you for sharing your view on this issue.

Just like you've mentioned - potential for abuse is real. And I worry that cross-posting will be a reason for many new flag wars and people being downvoted left and right.

I personally will discourage everyone from cross-posting to our project.hope community. Such a posts (on steemit) look like spam. Nothing inside except of link to original source.

Upvote on the way,
Yours, Piotr

Comments

[tarazkp]

Nothing inside except of link to original source.

You do not seem to understand and perhaps you should look at it through the interface that introduced it, Steempeak. They aren't empty posts there.

[crypto.piotr]

It's me again @tarazkp

You do not seem to understand and perhaps you should look at it through the interface that introduced it, Steempeak. They aren't empty posts there.

I'm not sure if this is the way to go. Only because one front-end introduced some feature - it doesnt mean that users should move to this particular front-end to avoid seeing "empty posts" (including cross-post link).

Anyway thanks for your reply. I appreciate it

ps.
I would need to ask you for little favour. Recently I've decided to join small contest called "Community of the week" and I desribed our project.hope hive/community. Would you mind helping me out and RESTEEM this post - just to get some extra exposure? Your valuable comment would be also appreciated.

Link to my post: on steemit or on steempeak

Thanks :)
Yours, Piotr

[oneray]

Mi apreciado @crypto.piotr, creo que educarnos y hacernos conscientes de los beneficios y posibles abusos, puede hacer que la integridad se preserve en cada steemian que use la publicación cruzada. ¿Has pensado que una excelente publicación que esté infravalorada sea un motivo para cruzarla? Tal vez hallemos una publicación que merece ser bien recompensada y no haya tenido la visibilidad para ser votada. Como dije en la publicación, esta herramienta de Steempeak es como un resteem, pero con beneficios adicionales. Es cierto que pueden existir abusos, pero... ¿Acaso no contamos con las herramientas para frenar el abuso? ¿Debemos desechar algo por tener algunos puntos que asumimos no favorables? La información, o mejor aún, la formación de steemians con los valores y principios correctos, evitará que se proliferen las malas prácticas a las que tanto tememos. Es cuestión de crear conciencia y las comunidades, juegan un papel importante en todo esto.

My dear @ crypto.piotr, I believe that educating ourselves and making us aware of the benefits and possible abuses can preserve the integrity of all steemians who use cross post. Have you thought that an excellent publication that is undervalued is a reason to cross it? We may find a publication that deserves to be well rewarded and has not had the visibility to be voted on. As I said in the post, this Steempeak tool is like a resteem, but with additional benefits. It is true that there may be abuse, but ... Do we not have the tools to stop the abuse? Should we discard something by thinking that some points we assume are not favorable? Information, or better yet, the formation of steemians with the correct values ​​and principles, will prevent the proliferation of bad practices that we fear so much. It is about raising awareness and communities play an important role in all this.