Yes, the more information, the better the analysis. Hive allows anyone to have their say internationally, so it is possible/likely that new information might be added to the subject as it is discussed here. If you pick a specific claim that you have found made publicly, then people can look into the evidence that is available for/against it and provide it in the comments. We can all then make up our own minds. The 'professional' fact checkers are generally only journalists who ask questions, source information and then often just reach a conclusion that may or may not reflect the true evidence that is available. We can all help to do better than that.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: