No, I am sorry, I did not want to put you in any corner; I just observed that bursting bubbles can be good for health & sanity; they were for mine at least..
(btw., my opinions on the subject were formed during extensive travels and living in the areas you are discussing. Do you have any relation to Russia or Ukraine? Do you have friends there? Do you speak Russian? If not, than I'd say 'bubble' might be a correct term.)
As you wrote in another comment, you expect others to do the dirty work. Your work seems to be the morality. As a plus it is also very low risk, and no consequences for you. I guess you also reside far away, so you are really not concerned. Me, I live next door and some of my friends in Ukraine are dead.
Bottom line, as dire as that sounds, this is the harsh reality: It is paramount to realise when to give up. And people all around perpetuating the illusion of winning are most responsible for the deaths.
(I know this paragraph will make you happy, you still believe in a finaly UA victory (to the last man!). Let's talk again in 1-3 years. We will officially have a failed state by then.)
But never the less: If you would follow through on your words, you would have to volunteer in Ukraine.
You don't need to be able to do justice with your own hands to argue and defend it. Otherwise only soldiers could opinionate about wars, and priests could teach nothing about marriage. This is a silly argument, in fact it is a falacy, the argumentum ad hominem:
If you argue for more killing, you should be ready to be killed ;)
(it's bit like it is not very balanced to eat meat but not be able to slaughter what you eat).
I guess you are not on the continent where this war is happening?
No, I am sorry, I did not want to put you in any corner; I just observed that bursting bubbles can be good for health & sanity; they were for mine at least..
(btw., my opinions on the subject were formed during extensive travels and living in the areas you are discussing. Do you have any relation to Russia or Ukraine? Do you have friends there? Do you speak Russian? If not, than I'd say 'bubble' might be a correct term.)
This is the falacy of authority. Attack my arguments, not the arguer.
I am just doubting your expertise here.
My expertise here is morality and moral arguments. Do they mean anything for you?
As you wrote in another comment, you expect others to do the dirty work. Your work seems to be the morality. As a plus it is also very low risk, and no consequences for you. I guess you also reside far away, so you are really not concerned. Me, I live next door and some of my friends in Ukraine are dead.
Bottom line, as dire as that sounds, this is the harsh reality: It is paramount to realise when to give up. And people all around perpetuating the illusion of winning are most responsible for the deaths.
(I know this paragraph will make you happy, you still believe in a finaly UA victory (to the last man!). Let's talk again in 1-3 years. We will officially have a failed state by then.)
But never the less: If you would follow through on your words, you would have to volunteer in Ukraine.
You don't need to be able to do justice with your own hands to argue and defend it. Otherwise only soldiers could opinionate about wars, and priests could teach nothing about marriage. This is a silly argument, in fact it is a falacy, the argumentum ad hominem:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
In fact it can not even be considered an argument, but only a threat and intimidation of the arguer
If you argue for more killing, you should be ready to be killed ;)
(it's bit like it is not very balanced to eat meat but not be able to slaughter what you eat).
I guess you are not on the continent where this war is happening?