Yes, I understand you wouldn't know anything about what actually transpired with Travelfeed and the community and you're looking at it as an observer. I'm telling you that you're looking at an iceberg. And its not my place here to reveal anything said in spaces where confidentiality is assumed. All I can say is this is just a small part of the story.
I have to treat all accounts the same. I can't treat an old lady differently than a young lady. It's a blockchain and all accounts appear as transactions, parts of blocks, lines of code, lines of text.
I do agree with you that we need guidelines published. I addressed that in a different comment. It's just delayed because of all the other critical tasks. There aren't that many of us working even with all the witnesses and developers together and all of us are tired. Some have gone nonstop since the takeover announcement in February. I have a list of deliverables that's longer than I can recite from memory. It'll get done and I'll get to it eventually.
You have to treat all accounts the same but why do larger accounts not get labeled for their abuse? Can you give a honest "yes" that if I bring you a link in the future of a whale abusing Hive with "low effort content", like my mother's was described, that you will ensure they have your blacklist next to their name?
They do. We have had and currently have whales on the blacklist.
Your mother's account isn't "low effort content", it was copy/paste. And yes, if anyone is caught doing that they will be added to the list. We don't actually deal with low effort content and we won't because not all people have the same capability of writing expansive essays.
That's ironic because it was described as low effort abuse in your Discord when I questioned about it. If it's that it's copy/paste does it not matter that she references the verse it si contained in and often gives a very brief personal detail on the post?