Thinking Out Loud
It occurs to me this is a true statement, but if you believe it's not please provide examples.
The State is a product of war.
Posted via D.Buzz
Thinking Out Loud
It occurs to me this is a true statement, but if you believe it's not please provide examples.
The State is a product of war.
Posted via D.Buzz
I love to think aloud.
Sometimes I make calculations out loud by myself and think about the future.
!PIZZA
Posted via D.Buzz
I'd flip it and say that war is a product of the state.
Posted via D.Buzz
That's true.
It's a chicken or the egg kind of question. Which came first?
Consider the revolutionary war. Certainly, it was a product of the State but it produced yet a new State.
At one point there would have been no state. Don't you think so?
Posted via D.Buzz
Nobody knows for sure of course, but with what is known so far, it seems that people came together in family groups for worship/religious purposes. As the gatherings grew, agriculture was developed to facilitate the gatherings. Then cities grew up as centers of...
Posted via D.Buzz
manufacturing and trade. So tribal and city state type governments are natural human governments. But somewhere along the way, some cities, and some tribes wanted to dominate others, and they formed the first states as instruments of control and organization.
Posted via D.Buzz
I think it's more likely people gathered in sizes larger than families to protect against rival groups. This explains why Neanderthals died out. They never organized and in spite of superior physicality and possibly intelligence, they were overwhelmed by superior numbers.
Posted via D.Buzz
Then the sizes of groups snowballed from there due to the ever-growing competition. Nothing smaller than a state would have a chance of survival.
Posted via D.Buzz
I gifted $PIZZA slices here:
@mehmetfix(1/10) tipped @neopatriarch (x1)
Send $PIZZA tips in Discord via tip.cc!
Yup. States are just one big perpetual arms race. Their existence doesn't make sense otherwise.
Posted via D.Buzz