I really enjoy your artwork and the message. This kind of image is more powerful than most people seem to understand. It can help an idea reach people on a level that intellectual discussions never could. Glad to see that you're on our side.
You may have just changed my life. I've been trying to write a book explaining; arguing for actual freedom. There are already better writers; deeper thinkers; people don't read their work, so I've always wondered why someone might read mine. Maybe this.
I really enjoy your artwork and the message. This kind of image is more powerful than most people seem to understand. It can help an idea reach people on a level that intellectual discussions never could. Glad to see that you're on our side.
Posted via D.Buzz
You may have just changed my life. I've been trying to write a book explaining; arguing for actual freedom. There are already better writers; deeper thinkers; people don't read their work, so I've always wondered why someone might read mine. Maybe this.
Posted via D.Buzz
That's probably one of the greatest compliments ever received by me. Thanks...
Posted via D.Buzz
William Wallace fought for FREEDOM. If you saw Braveheart, you know what I mean.
It is interesting how countries fight for freedom from the rule of a man, yet people only want liberty under the rule of a man.
Posted via D.Buzz
Does this mean that liberty is merely freely-chosen slavery? Or something to that effect?
If so, then there needs to be a serious re-evaluation of the term and the ideas we associate with it.
It means one is either free or governed.
Free men have Rights.l; Governed men have liberties.
Rights are permissionless and cannot be rescinded; liberties are by permission and revokable.
Rights precede the State and persist.
Posted via D.Buzz
So for example, It may be rightly said that Australians have the Right to bear arms even though they do not have the liberty to do so.
Abolish the State
Posted via D.Buzz