Good morning. My level of knowledge about this is poor so I'm relegated to asking questions. Excessive to me would have been a full upvote for minimal, or no, posting content. Your example isn't far off the mark so that's a new standard for me to learn from. I followed his response to your justification post and it seemed like he agreed with you.
And now, once caught, still has enough insolence to argue, and to blaim against those who unmasked his abuse and his nature.
It's a natural response to rewards removal, I think. That will change with consistency and the justification. As far as I understood it, you are justified as disagreement on rewards is allowed. The standard is changing to against self-voting. It's a little confusing to me, but as I'll have to start looking at rewards eventually I need to learn as much as I can.