... unless the vote itself was excessive.
I wonder what level is "excessive" on your valuation scale, @scholaris.pob ?
Does 58+% or even 28% of all voting power on SELFVOTING own COMMENTS is not excessive enough?
(it does not matter if done from the same account, or hiding from another, alternative account of the same person)
Look closer at his alt account @futurebrain - this alt account created for one simple reason - to hide his greedy selfvotes. Account with zero posts, 6 comments, zero followers, zero following, 1HP Hive stake and 100 delegated HP, only to maintain the minimum level of RC, keeping ONLY the POB tokens, which all comes from his other account. It is all so obvious what his goals are.
And now, once caught, still has enough insolence to argue, and to blaim against those who unmasked his abuse and his nature.
Open your eyes, people.
Good morning. My level of knowledge about this is poor so I'm relegated to asking questions. Excessive to me would have been a full upvote for minimal, or no, posting content. Your example isn't far off the mark so that's a new standard for me to learn from. I followed his response to your justification post and it seemed like he agreed with you.
It's a natural response to rewards removal, I think. That will change with consistency and the justification. As far as I understood it, you are justified as disagreement on rewards is allowed. The standard is changing to against self-voting. It's a little confusing to me, but as I'll have to start looking at rewards eventually I need to learn as much as I can.