You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: This is something I do not understand. All who are on this list - welc ...

in DBuzz • 3 years ago

You shouldn't be getting downvotes because of self-voting. Last time I checked, that wasn't illegal unless the vote itself was excessive. Excessive to me would be like if I posted just a picture and then upvoted myself 20 POB.

Rewards disagreement? Maybe. Were your downvotes equivalent to your upvote value? Just trying to understand the problem.

Posted via proofofbrain.io

3 years ago in DBuzz by
$0.00
    1 vote
    Reply 4
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     3 years ago (edited) 

    ... unless the vote itself was excessive.

    I wonder what level is "excessive" on your valuation scale, @scholaris.pob ?
    Does 58+% or even 28% of all voting power on SELFVOTING own COMMENTS is not excessive enough?

    (it does not matter if done from the same account, or hiding from another, alternative account of the same person)
    Look closer at his alt account @futurebrain - this alt account created for one simple reason - to hide his greedy selfvotes. Account with zero posts, 6 comments, zero followers, zero following, 1HP Hive stake and 100 delegated HP, only to maintain the minimum level of RC, keeping ONLY the POB tokens, which all comes from his other account. It is all so obvious what his goals are.

    And now, once caught, still has enough insolence to argue, and to blaim against those who unmasked his abuse and his nature.
    Open your eyes, people.

    [-]
     3 years ago  

    Good morning. My level of knowledge about this is poor so I'm relegated to asking questions. Excessive to me would have been a full upvote for minimal, or no, posting content. Your example isn't far off the mark so that's a new standard for me to learn from. I followed his response to your justification post and it seemed like he agreed with you.

    And now, once caught, still has enough insolence to argue, and to blaim against those who unmasked his abuse and his nature.

    It's a natural response to rewards removal, I think. That will change with consistency and the justification. As far as I understood it, you are justified as disagreement on rewards is allowed. The standard is changing to against self-voting. It's a little confusing to me, but as I'll have to start looking at rewards eventually I need to learn as much as I can.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       3 years ago  

      I guess its excessive in my case, even though I power up 100% and support the POB community!!!! Meanwhile he's upvoting comments 10X what he removed from single comments from me and they are about equal length! If that's not some hypocritical shit idk what is.

      Posted via proofofbrain.io