I would love to see more importance given to AFITX holders - this was created as a governance token for Actifit, but I see no governance decisions asked from the holders.
I see a lot of work done by the team. How you set priorities?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
their tokens are kinda dead for years, could be one of the worst tokenizations on hive, I think with blocktrades vote all these project don't need users anymore, don't care about users much, are allowed to fail, i doubt blocktrades even know how to check their tokens, ignorance is epic. their token pool on engine have liquidity for 400$ when they ask for 230$ daily from hive. Rewarding users is clearly not a point here but milking dhf...
Look how with time whole thing changing towards infra and meeting blocktrades expectations just to save their jobs. If first proposal was about their application next proposal was about infra and onboarding, now they removed onboarding as we all know it's fake idea, no one really knows how to do it and maybe it was previous blocktrades expectation but he kinda learn very slowly...
every next proposal have less votes, is it normal for successful proposal?
I think they already already have another proposal for haf infra, taking 300-400$? more for something they did here previously for 230$? why this split? is it one of the simplest to recognize issues with centralized uneffective governance? it becomes super weird what you people do...
WEAK
all you can get from selling their tokens is something like 300 HIVE ?
WEAK
We disagree.
While our focus hasn't been on token liquidity, more so on development, user growth and retention. Yet Numbers don't lie. Here are few recent stats from Actifit user base, retention and usage
Our daily average rewarded # of actifit reports (users who created content and are eligible for rewards) is around 160, the DAU would be on the higher end as not all users earn rewards.
We onboarded (via our Actifit direction paid account creation) last year 248 new users.
We do not have a proposal for haf infra. The proposal you are alluding to is the block explorer dev, which is purely for development resources/team completely separate from Actifit team, performing development on block explorer, and does not fund any server/infra costs.
In a nutshell, we are one of the longest lasting projects on hive that is continuously growing, and are proud to continue to be building on and bringing more users to hive.
Thank you for your feedback, much appreciated. Indeed a lot of work was done and is planned for more growth for Actifit.
We usually discuss internally within the team, and include feedback from the community shared via our discord under suggestions channel, and prioritize according to several metrics including complexity, user effect, usability effect, and market needs.
Regarding AFITX, it is true one of the use cases planned previously for AFITX was governance, but that is not the sole benefit of owning AFITX as it affects your whole gamified experience in actifit including user rank, rewards, ...
We will review how we can expand AFITX into a more governance focus going forward.hey @steemmillionaire,