Marky, from what I have seen, votes absolutely nothing other than stabiliser and has been doing that for many months.
Because I have 3 whales downvoting everything I upvote and everything I post for the last year, everyone knows this.
It is a strategy so that he doesn't have to put any time into the community and can increase his curation percentage at the same time. It's obvious.
This is bullshit, I've been one of the most benevolent curators for the last few years prior.
I have no recollection of that but curation is designed to be a way to earn rewards on your investment.. I'm not really sure it's possible to be a benevolent curator as such - other than by not upvoting yourself. Anyway, what I want is a community that looks out for each other, I am not intending to attack you or anyone here - I'm just tired of feeling like I'm being attacked while all I'm actually trying to do is to help people.
Which you do for $15-20/post. And by benevolent I mean I don't self vote, I cannot be influenced by votes, I don't play favorites, I voted over 200 unique authors a week, many of my votes were for people who got very little support, I could go on. But really this is just using pulling me in as a strawman argument to take the attention off you. I was no part of this, nor does what I do justify what you do.
So you pull me into this argument that has nothing to do with me to attack me to deflect? I can't even be bothered to read what this is about.
I have literally made a handful of posts which have received larger upvotes recently - that's it. The account isn't mine and the rules are mostly nonsensical - which is why Steem was designed a different way, originally - by people who, to me, understood the situation a lot better.
So you curate for the benefit of others? Why not give your curation rewards away to the people you upvote who get very little support? Now that would be really benevolent.
Perhaps you have forgotten downvoting a post I made at about 100% and then when I complained and you understood the situation, you apologised and didn't reverse the downvote. It didn't feel benevolant and everyone in the room laughed at you.. but anyway.
That's why your content is 9.1% of all the votes in the last 7 days? Good curation you got going on there. In fact, you are the top account you (self)vote with that free delegation.
I didn't appologize, and the downvote was justified. In fact, I was sick of your whining for 6 months about downvotes in just about every discord you were in.
You absolutely did apologise, but I a not going to debate it.
Show me where, because I know the incident well.
If you know it well, then you know where it is. I am going to sleep, it's nearly 7am.
The posts I made were in the last 7 days, yes. Prior to that there are very few - last year almost zero.
I spend hours looking for posts to upvote - if the quality was here I would happily upvote them. The quality is not here - which is actually one of the reasons you have given in the past for upvoting stabiliser.
They obviously don't because I don't and I've never heard anyone mentioning it.
Why do they do that and who are they?