There are a wide variety of errors that people can introduce into such analysis and I have already seen that a) a lot of 'scientists' are very poorly skilled (as with most other industries) and b) there are definitely deliberate paid misinfo agents inserted into the movement to examine Pfizer et al (controlled opposition).
So really, some kind of consistent independent monitoring that can be repeated is needed.. (This is actually how science of this kind should be carried out in 100% of cases anyway). I have no idea of the logistics of that and whether the shots are even still available from the earlier batches - plus how long their shelf life is. I imagine it wouldn't be difficult to have dubious batches binned due to their shelf life expiring and to then make later batches a bit better. One thing I hear repeatedly is that they often contain all kinds of metals and rubber from 'poor production practices - which is why Japanese gov rejected some large deliveries previously. That in itself is bad enough.
Thanks, I should have worn a body camera during my time in hospital - it's shocking what has been done. Court case is in process.