Although I have used the words ‘’hedge fund‘’ to explain my idea and the proposal as a whole, it is obviously not intended to be a hedge fund.
So none of the US regulations apply in this respect.
If we are looking for reasons and legal certainty to do or not to do things, I am sure Hive would not even exist in the first place.
Thanks for the contribution Azir :)
Well you are talking about a DHF proposal and to pass a DHF proposal you will need votes. The people who will give such votes are mostly from the US. So I think trumpman already mentioned the issue of passing a proposal and how hard it gets.
You asked for a feedback and so I have given you one. Even if you are not in US, there are stockholders who are and they will need to abide by US laws to the best of their ability
PS also read what gerber says below. Every word of his statement is true
Even if a Hive holder resides in the US, I don't understand how voting on such a proposal can affect him (at least not right off the bat).
It doesn't seem to me that there is any difference in voting for this hypothetical proposal compared to another one such as Valueplan (regardless of the obvious differences in amounts).
On the other hand, I don't know if my tone was correct in my previous comment (ENG is not my native language), I have the feeling that in a way my answer could have been considered aggressive.
If that was the case, I apologise. I value interactions with you in this regard.
voting: no
investing: yes, very deep yes!
no apology needed, no offense taken.