Their proposal is for joint marketing with partners and for half the price you've stated. The conversion is hard to measure since the Dash partnership alone got Hive accounts a lot of views. I don't know if I can pull stats off X that are clear enough, but the partnership budget seems to have worked well. I'd say its a major pivot from the original Leo proposal that concluded that predates integrations and focused on onboarding users. The AI bots that various people launch don't have anything to do with these partnerships that are upcoming or their marketing. The Leo proposal as I read it and anyone can read clearly states that the funds are for marketing budgets which are required for integrations. I'm not a fan of AI bots and you know what AI itself thinks about it since I posted that transcript in chat. But I don't see what this has to do with a budget to buy social media ads and press releases.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Am I the only one here remembers (or at least will admit it) that it was actually for $1,295/day but was changed?
The total matters in all proposals, not the daily.
Actually all that matters is what Hive gets from it. As you can see from the actually numbers, that's a much lower number. All we can reference though is what is asked for.
I get what you're saying but my point is, having read their proposal, the proposal isn't about the topic of this discussion. The proposal is about putting up a marketing budget to match the integration chain's budget. We're confusing three distinct issues which is 1. onboarding 2. AI bots 3. marketing proposal.