Your statements are slanderous libel and defaming and you state them as fact, yet you provide no proof, evidence, or sourced information.
I just screenshot a image directly from the show that shows without any shadow of the doubt them doxxing a parent of a murdered child? Even finger pointing on a google maps image.
So thats nonsense and a lie. Lets count your lies.
He didn't blame anyone.
He called it fake, said clearly, no one died, and claimed the parents are actors, coached, etc.. He made claims.
when he provides documentation to every claim he states as fact.
He makes conclusions from data, that might or might not be factual and he interprets as he pleases suiting his narrative. For example. He sees a parent smiling, he makes the conclusion that its all a hoax.
You mention Assange with high esteem but casually brush off his ongoing demise
His predicament is of no relation to anything written about here. The post I make about Assange will cover things related to Assange.
How is it that you followed Jones for 15 years and see what is going on all over the world today and still say with a straight face that he is lying and making things up?
Because I have followed his work for 15 years and seen him making stuff up and lying as is the case with Sandy Hook in question.
You basically excuse the media for colluding with big tech, and the government to spread outright lies and propaganda and suppress and censor speech for political agendas that erode our rights and endanger our well being as just party narratives and talking points.
No I dont. I name various cases of lies by other fake news like Alex Jones. I even take the step to explain how narrative creation works. So again, lies.
While in the real world, all over the globe govts are parroting the same authoritarian agenda which includes suppressing speech and controlling "disinformation" with the actual disinformation coming from those who are doing the controlling.
Disinformation comes from all sides as I stated here. There is nothing "conspiratorial" about political players forming narratives that suit them.
The Covid narrative is crumbling before everyone's eyes and the truth of collusion between governments, big tech, the media and pharma in a global crime against humanity is coming to light.
Thats absurd and idiotic. COVID is a real thing. Misplaced intentions and capitalists exploiting the situation is not proof of a conspiracy to do harm. Thats insane to claim.
See thats the problem. You guys need a boogieman wanting to kill everyone or whatever. So you invent one. In 20 years of Jones bullshit he has never been able to pinpoint who these people are or prove it whatsover. Politicians come and go, people die, others struggle for power. As it has always been.
All you have are flawed governments doing flawed government things.
So Id say you lied here about half the time and half the time you were wrong.
Yeah, it's all just misplaced intentions and flawed governments, compounded by my ignorance and insincerity.
Wish I could be like you and know everything.
I just have problems with willful ignorance and self righteous narcissism.
Somehow I can't bring myself to ignore documented facts and real world events and write them off as coincidence or incompetence because the truth would shatter my ego and view of how I want to believe the world works.
Every person has the right to equal justice under the law.
This case is about setting a precedent to strip dissenting voices of their civil rights and due process.
You may believe the defendants are guilty according to the things you have seen and heard, but there was no jury or trial by evidence, there was no guilty verdict on defamation according to the facts. There was a default by a judge that was used as precedent in both cases (TX,CT) and show trial hearings for amounts meant to destroy the network, which along with every other aspect of the case have been lied about and misrepresented in the media. In TX there is a cap of 5 million on damages but the media reported 50 million in punitive damages, which doesn't go to the plaintiffs.
You seem to believe peoples' rights should be dependent upon your judgements, according to your personal opinions about them, according to your world view and what you read on Google. That is the most ridiculously naive response I have heard in a while btw "Google it". Is Google rigging the algorithms a conspiracy theory as well?
You frame your argument as should "we" do this or should "we" do that. Individual rights aren't conveyed by the masses or majority rule, they are inherent to each individual, No person has any authority, morally or otherwise to decide that my beliefs are not allowed or I don't have the right to express my beliefs because they are contrary to the majority. Where does that begin and end? Do you decide for all of us what is truth and what is not. Are you willing to conform when your beliefs are deemed lies and misinformation?
I completely disagree with your perspective on this issue.
I do however appreciate you raising the topic, it is of the ultimate importance.
Your opinion of me personally is of no concern.
Regardless of your cavalier dismissal of the obvious facts of our current reality, the assault on the individual liberties is real and escalating exponentially, and should be of grave concern to those who value their freedom and humanity and are willing to accept the truth.
I hope you have as much zeal for promoting accountability when the facts about Covid and the shots can no longer be hidden.
Whatever dude.
LOL