You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Vote for these proposals. We used a strategy negotiated by the Hive Witnesses.

in #hive5 years ago

[Note that the Steem (now Hive) witnesses apparently negotiated this compromise and then turned around to punish the Koreans for participating in it. In addition, they punished us for using the same strategy that they negotiated.]

This comment shows how mislead and misinformed you are. I was a Steem witness at the time and I didn't agree to any deal that I renegged on. @aggroed is a single person. He does not speak for "the witnesses".

I will be keeping my vote for proposal #103 and #104.

Sort:  

Also

The Korean proxy also voted with this strategy in mind. Even aggroed said that this was a good compromise. Here is one of his tweets:

aggroed was 100% wrong about anything being a good compromise and that was clear at the time.

The SCT/proxy.token (not all Koreans) "strategy" was to make ransom demands because they wanted to milk Steem harder but couldn't do that with their minority stake. They played a stupid game that resulted in Hive splitting from Steem. And then they complain they didn't get any airdrop to Hive when they got exactly what they wanted. Greedy idiots.

Edit:

After three days, @cmp2020 has not followed up with this post or any replies to him. continues to post and comment on Steem, has not acknowledged that his "strategy" was faulty,

and on top of all that

On Steem, this father-son power duo are voting for @steemchiller and @exnihilo.witness who are both running 0.22.8888, active participants in fucking over legitimate Steem stakeholders that added incalculable value to Steem. Way more than those bottom-feeding, scavenger sham witnesses leeching from the corpse of Steem ever will. https://steemd.com/@remlaps

No

You're not much different from the SCT crowd who voted as a "strategy." The Hive airdrop exclusion was made exactly for this kind of stakeholder. You will not get my vote. Voting for those witnesses on Steem, you have earned my active participation in campaigning against such a bad idea. Your irresponsible voting and actions have consequences here.

I am sorry that I did not respond, but I didn't because I have a life and no one's opinion is going to be swayed by me.

We voted for those two because we want to support the individuals. Not because we support what is going on with hf 22.8888. We have been on the fence about it. Maybe we will stop. Edit as of May 11th: In addition, @steemchiller is one of the people who was "accidentally included" in the blacklist, and is being forgiven. Why is the Hive leadership giving him an airdrop if he is an "active participant in f-ing over legitimate Steem stakeholders that added incalculable value to Steem"? Maybe it's because they like him as a developer, and are trying to do the exact same thing that we are trying to do (which is give him a reason to use their platform).

I'm sorry that you feel that way. Good luck with your campaign. Frankly, 20 years from now, hive is not going to matter to me, and I am not going to care about what you think of me, so go ahead and think it. I'm a composer first and foremost, and you can't take that away. Good luck on Hive. The future holds what the future holds, and I am sick of feeling angry all of the time at you people.