Hahaha! I can’t believe what I’m hearing here sir. There’s a lot going on over here on my end and these sorts of expectations certainly don’t make sense...
Writing 10 parts to a White Paper is in it’s self a monumental task... let alone doing all the other things a personal trainer and a family man must do.
I do my absolute best to respond to comments but this is something that is done within my time frame.
I don’t understand your rational in thinking and to be honest with you... it does seem to be a little unreasonable... especially when you consider the number of comments I’m currently dealing with.
Why such a stance?
It doesn’t seem to be a fair one if you ask me...
I’m speaking with you directly.
But all things considered... if this is your approach to things... then this is your approach.
Either way. I still do wish that you would reconsider this hard line approach. It really could be much friendlier and more fair and considerate.
Regards,
Please excuse me, but this is my choice. I sincerely wish you all the best.
I’m fine with however you want to approach things... however I do wish that you would reconsider this line of thinking as it’s probably not going to serve you well.
No one is entitled to a return comment... and if someone does take their time to do so that in and of it’s self should be enough. Commenting back on someone else’s timeframe should never be considered a test. That, in my humble opinion, is quite an unfriendly way to think about comments.
The last thing you want is for people to feel obligated to respond in order to keep open contact on the blockchain. You want comments to flow naturally and rapport to come with sincerity and kindness.
Making it a test of friendship if someone comments back within an undefined timeline... that’s just not a great way to social.
I’m not one to mince words and I say it how I see it...
But this is as far as I will take this.
Please consider my words and I do honestly wish you well and all the success here on this blockchain.
Regards,
@wil.metcalfe