Well @Haejin does this 10 times a day for many months. @Berniesanders was fighting that for months wasting his SP.
Bernie has raped the reward pool for far longer, with multiple accounts, and through deceptive means. For, as much as he can't resist the urge to abuse his power, he for some reason likes to appear as the good guy. I'd much prefer an honest villain to one who masquerades as a hero.
Do I agree with him getting that reward? I do, because otherwise he could join the other side and do what Haejin does and we could have two donkeys by now.
Do you really believe this nonsense, mate? I hope so, because the other alternative is that you are hoping berniesanders will read this and upvote you, and I care not for that sort of arselickery on my posts. Anyone who sells votes is not on your side. They get curation rewards for voting fairly, but they don't vote fairly. They sell you what was always yours to begin with, and then act like they have done something honourable. Meanwhile, they are accumulating more and more power over the network when their task was to help distribute the wealth, not horde it.
If you are going to compare vote distributions then you will first have to uncover all of his accounts, which won't be easy, because he has a fucking lot of them.
I suggest you start providing some proof about these "deceptive means".
Selling votes is not deceptive, in fact, it's all clear and visible on the blockchain.
Selling votes is deceptive for a number reasons, but I do not refer to this. Don't worry though, I will take your suggestion and run with it.