Well @Haejin does this 10 times a day for many months. @Berniesanders was fighting that for months wasting his SP.
Do I agree with him getting that reward? I do, because otherwise he could join the other side and do what Haejin does and we could have two donkeys by now.
Just compare the vote distribution of @haejin , @ranchorelaxo and @berniesanders
It's not the same case.
I'm aware of all of this... and still believe it will fix nothing!... It's not even supposed too... Read the Blue Paper!!
Please backup your arguments. I don't have time for the blue paper
Then backup ur issues... It will save you a lifetime..
Then you will stand wrong!
That's how it goes... No one has time to figure the real issues/solutions...they should expect Juses/Hitlery to fix it... And it won't get fix, because it's not their ground/field... It's us! They can't help it even if they tried...ohhh, I forgot... They don't even exist, except on some ppls minds...my bad!
The blue paper is only 7 pages I can read it in 10 minutes. If you keep providing generic arguments without substance I will have nothing to argue with.
You said it will fix nothing: are you talking about flagging or reporting abusers? Because both work pretty well and save our precious reward pool
"No one has time to figure the real issues/solutions": do you mind sharing us your insights since you did spend the time. If you're alluding to the whole steem system, then I can agree its not perfect but how is doing nothing better than what berniesanders do?!
Simple.... From the Blue paper, for Dummies!
Rewards for Content Creators and Curators
The exact definition of what Steemit Inc. finds as being valuable content:
The users who produce content are adding value to the network by creating material that will drive new users to the platform, as well as keep the existing users engaged and entertained.
This is to me very clear, valuable content, or content that is adding value to the network is meeting one of those or both criteria:
It is material that will drive new users to the platform.
It is material that will keep the existing users engaged and entertained.
You didn't bring anything new by reading your blue paper. That is the reason why we flag, we disagree on what brings users to the platform and keep them engaged. So far only @ranchorelaxo finds value in @haejin content and that's why he is always on trending. There are countless number of TAs who are better/or same that don't get this reward.
What you think is driving users to the platform I think is actually destroying the platform. If his content is really worth it to be trending. Then let his whale friend stop pumping him and we can see how many users think he's bring anything to the platform.
He doesn't engage with anyone but himself. Look at this circle jerk.
Bernie has raped the reward pool for far longer, with multiple accounts, and through deceptive means. For, as much as he can't resist the urge to abuse his power, he for some reason likes to appear as the good guy. I'd much prefer an honest villain to one who masquerades as a hero.
Do you really believe this nonsense, mate? I hope so, because the other alternative is that you are hoping berniesanders will read this and upvote you, and I care not for that sort of arselickery on my posts. Anyone who sells votes is not on your side. They get curation rewards for voting fairly, but they don't vote fairly. They sell you what was always yours to begin with, and then act like they have done something honourable. Meanwhile, they are accumulating more and more power over the network when their task was to help distribute the wealth, not horde it.
If you are going to compare vote distributions then you will first have to uncover all of his accounts, which won't be easy, because he has a fucking lot of them.
I suggest you start providing some proof about these "deceptive means".
Selling votes is not deceptive, in fact, it's all clear and visible on the blockchain.
Selling votes is deceptive for a number reasons, but I do not refer to this. Don't worry though, I will take your suggestion and run with it.
he does vote for himself. bernie owns like 10 accounts that constantly upvote everything he posts. hes a hypocrite to the nth degree.