Dear @newsandviews, never say sorry to me. I don't take anything personally. Nothing ever crushes my nuts.
Au contraire, I welcome all information that can change my perspective. In truth, I really appreciate such types of comments, as it shows me that you care enough to take the time to bring them to my attention. And for that, I am truly grateful.
You made me think that I should be more diligent in whom I choose to listen to and believe; and to question more.
I didn't know about Gregory Mannarino being a Freemason (I did a reverse image search and found the page on which it was posted - his own post). And just moments ago, I wrote a comment on it showing my disappointment, as there are a lot of nefarious types who operate in secrecy in this organization (no doubt about that, as I've done years of research on the subject, even findout out about strong linkages between Freemasonry to the Illuminati - which still exists). I invited him to reply and have a polite discussion on the matter but doubt he will even see my reply or respond. We will see.
At the end of the day there is only one person you can trust:
- yourself
But I still do think that in the aggregate, it is a very good thing to have these types - whether they are "controlled opposition" or not, reveal some truths and bad shit happening, as the effect is beneficial to help awaken those who are in blue-pill-zombie-land, don't you think?
I mean, if we don't put at least some faith in others, we are doomed, no?
I cannot not believe that there aren't people from all walks of life and in all kinds of organizations (including government and the military) who are at least trying to install positive change while trying to combat such evil. If I am wrong about this, then humanity has no hope.
Thanks again for engaging in this very important discourse (I am more the type to use the dialectic method rather than the debate method, as there's a much better chance for getting to the truth and gaining true knowledge).
Cheers,
That's excellent! I truly appreciate people that are willing to question anything and everything.. that takes real maturity. Something that I just realized that Sean at SGT Report clearly doesn't have. Feel free to have a read of the latest "conversation" I've been having with him in the comments section of his latest post.
Regarding Mannarino, I would be incredibly surprised if he responded. His background is actually as a nurse physician and there's also nothing there that indicates that he ever worked for Bear Stearns. He's in Las Vegas because he used to write books on his system for Blackjack gambling. When he started on YouTube he dressed like a hippie, and then when he decided to talk about options trading he started with his suit and tie routine to make him look legitimate.
What this also likely means however is that guys like Greg Hunter at USA Watchdog are also full of it. Greg always talks about his good friend Gregory Mannarino. This means that either he knows all his BS and pushes him anyway, or he's been duped by his BS for ages now. "I'll take what's behind door number one, Monty.."
It's true that you can only trust yourself and you need to be incredibly careful of others in the "truth industry." I really believe that the majority of well known alternative media guys are controlled opposition at this point. I suppose that you could say there is some value in them for those that would never swallow a full bottle of red pills, but I still think they provide more harm than good in the long run. They create an invisible wall that nobody except the truly bold ever get past, and it's this wall that is keeping out the masses from the most important truths that I believe would really make a difference if people understood them.
I'm not sure how much hope humanity has at this point.. as depressing as that sounds. The manipulation of the individual has gotten so far that I'm not sure if it's resolvable anymore. I hope and pray that this is not the case, but the masses as so hopelessly addicted, asleep, or brainwashed that I'm not sure we can wake them before the our window for potential resistance runs out. If not, the power of the "dumb-ass democracy" will finish the rest of us off by turning truths into the threat. I assume this sad reality is why people like Sean at SGT want a Q / Trump savior so badly and express so much cognitive dissonance when confronted on it. In any case, I will keep up the good fight in the hope that I can still make a dent in the globalist plans and very much I expect you will do the same..
And of course, I very much appreciate the conversation, and look forward to having many more good conversations in the future. Thanks again for being intelligent, open-minded, and open for discussion. That's always very much appreciated.
Now I'm reading your comments as well! great stuff.
Any thoughts on Jeff Berwick? - I certainly do but sometimes he comes out with something really cool and keeps me guessing. But then he says buy EOS!
Doubt he is the type to sell out, as he really does genuinely seem to despise TPTB types. Not sure what do make of his stance on EOS or whether it will really promote what it is intended to (at least on the surface).
OK, so now back to my comment above that Greg Hunter is alt media tool - and a major Zionist tool at that.. So Hunter has on another buddy of his, Mark Taylor. At the end of the interview they are essentially doing virtual high fives that Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Check it out at 24:45:
So what this says to me is that he's another Christian Zionist plant working with Freemason buddies like Mannarino selling snake oil about Trump stopping all the evil attacking the US.
Catch me if I'm wrong, but in the history books I've read, it's the US militarily dominating and acting as the henchman that is stealing from everyone else on the planet, and second only to Israel and the UK in terms of dirty tricks and deeds. So of course, who are the two nations that God is supposedly protecting and making all powerful.. you guessed it the US and Israel.. Let me stop here to vomit a little..
Welcome back! Firstly, I must say smtg about this guest. I never liked him and think he is a complete BS'er, snake oil salesman type. He doesn't back up much of his talk with facts or tangible information, only the "word" from God.
About Greg Hunter. This is definitely his major flaw (defending Israel and never criticizing them). I've actually confronted him a few times on this issue both by email and on his site. Basically, I made him realize that Zionism does exist and that it is at the crux of most of our ills. To further substantiate this, I merely pointed to the fact that one of his best guests was Dr. Paul Craig Roberts who has very often written about the evil Zionists. And I provided him with a link to a Bing search "Paul Craig Roberts" & "Zionist" (or "Zionism"). Greg no longer knew what to see. I had definitely stumped him. That was about a year ago, and I have yet to see Dr. Roberts re-appear on his show (which tells me a lot).
So, I agree with you in large part about Greg and his stance supporting Israel and never putting any blame on Zionists. (Which are two completely different things which I've previously sated in a previous post of mine).
To give him some credit, however, he still has a lot of good quality guests (e.g., Kevin Shipp, Bill Holter, and others) who help to expose a lot of crap. He also pointed us to an ex-FBI agent that demonstrated how Deep State Mueller had usurped and corrupted the agency).
Let's face it, each and everyone out there has their faults.
But I still think it is better to have these guys in aggregate as the net result is a lot of exposure to these bad actors and agendas.
What is the alternative? They all shut up / close down and thousands less get informed? It ain't perfect, but besides us small minnows it's all we got to work with. So do, pls try to keep positive and hopeful.
Cheers
Thanks a lot for the comments! I would disagree (as you probably expected already), but let me try to explain better why. The term "gatekeeper" is a very appropriate one because what these guys try to do is keep people from figuring out the bigger picture as well as the really important players involved. Even worse, they try to get people cheering for a number of the bad actors and actions including the Zionists, the military, the current government, and whatever other BS they can insert.
Now considering the size of the truth community out there, don't you think that if all these pricks were rejected by the masses for being the manipulating and blackholing asswipes they are, that other good alt media guys would pop up to the surface instead? In other words, you are currently presupposing that because you get rid of the bad apples with worms in them, that there are no apples left to eat.. This isn't true.
I've been looking around lately for people that do really good research and really good news stories and I've found a number of them, but they don't get big followings..why?.. because the other fake pricks with slicker videos and bigger budgets suck up their likely audiences instead.
And regarding the guys you mention like Bill Holter, Kevin Shipp, and others like them. Let's remember that these guys don't require to be seen all the time because they always have pretty much the exact same messages. Instead, you want refreshing new guests that do great research. Have you ever wondered why none of these crappy channels provide that? Do you think it's just because they can't find anybody else to have on? Isn't there a reason that none of them ever have really insightful guests that cover important history or deep research into current events?
I think we are being totally played and we shouldn't settle for dumbed down and Pied Piper content as an alternative. No one needs this.. not even the those that aren't really woken up yet, because what is it that these fake media actors are providing that's really worth waking for?
So guys that are telling the truth are ones like Matthew North and Jake Morphonios. I'm sure there are a lot more of them too, but they at least follow the research and facts and lay them out very clearly. This is exactly what a real journalist is supposed to do..
Hello my friend. You've made some good points. I didn't know about Matthew North so will look into him (which is his main platform?). I do like Jake Morphonios and have referenced him as well. I like the way he researches and presents verifiable facts (e.g., Genie Energy). What are your thoughts on Luke from We are Change, Rob Kirby, and Dan Dicks (Press for Truth)? Any red flags on these guys? And who else to you like to help spread the truth and seem to be in the legit club?
I get the impression that Jeff will definitely sell out whenever it affects his wallet. If he's got a boatload of EOS, you can be damn sure he'll push it hard. Will he still bitch about TPTB?..sure, but he'll burn others by selling them crap if he needs to to make himself whole.
I'm also pretty damn sceptical of the whole anarcho-capitalist spiel. TPTB love to take the extremes on both sides of any debate. If they run communism (and they do), you can be damn sure that they run the anarcho-capitalist push as well.
I have a lot of reasons to perceive anarcho-capitalism as complete BS. Have you ever listened to the religious ones try to explain how some of the the most basic government activities are supposed to run in their model..it's a total joke. It will never work. Now this of course doesn't mean government shouldn't be minimized to the maximum degree and be massively controlled by the people.. absolutely it should. However, the fantasy that anarcho-capitalism is a workable system is ridiculous.
Amen brother. Looking forward to many more fruitful exchanges. :-)
What are your thoughts on Luke from We Are Change and that fellow that does 'A Call for an Uprising' YouTube channel?
And how about Kevin Shipp for which I did a 3-part series summarizing his revelations? Any hope there?
Kevin Shipp - CIA puppet is my call!
The problem with Kevin Shipp is he's blathering on with the same "Trump is fighting the Deep State BS." This makes him highly suspicious. You know what they say about ex-CIA.. there is no ex-CIA.
I actually found his lectures on the Deep State structure informative and I didn't notice any major inaccuracies in it. This is why I posted it. I thought it was a useful presentation, but overall he appears to be parroting a line of Trump BS. From this perspective Sift is right, it's very likely that's he still an active disinfo agent.