Dayanna Volitich, a 25-year-old social studies teacher at Crystal River Middle School in Florida, has been secretly hosting the white nationalist podcast “Unapologetic” under the pseudonym “Tiana Dalichov” and bragging about teaching her views in a public school, HuffPost has discovered.
In her most recent podcast on Feb. 26, a guest railed against diversity in schools, dismissing the idea that “a kid from Nigeria and a kid who came from Sweden are supposed to learn exactly the same” and have the “same IQ.” Volitich enthusiastically agreed with the guest, and went on to argue that “science” has proven that certain races are smarter than others.
In the same episode, Volitich boasted about bringing her white nationalist beliefs into the classroom and hiding her ideology from administrators. She said that when parents complained to the school’s principal about how she is injecting political bias into the classroom, Volitich lied to the principal and said it was not true.
I read this headline and thought "Oh my that's not good" I'm sure that was most people's reaction to the headline but then I read that actually story and it's pretty much the same race baiting crap the main stream media(MSM) says about anyone that disagrees with the left.
Does anyone really know what the term White Nationalist means? It seems to be just a term the MSM uses as an attack call for all the social justice warriors(SJWs) to swoop in and start hen pecking the person being labeled as a White Nationalist.
This is called Tribalism. It's a fundamental part of being human and I would argue it's ingrained in our DNA to form groups and loyalties to people you can related to rather than a so called outsider. Animals do the same sort of thing and calling this racist is just part of the plan by the globalist to make you rely on government rather than you're family and friends.
I listen to her first four podcasts.
https://player.fm/series/unapologetic-wtiana-dalichov
One podcast was about reforming islam. Her argument was simple, Mohammed isn't that great of a role model considering he raped a child, murdered and enslaved people. Also the fact that a small minority of Muslims believe in killing infidels and waging jihad but the majority of mulsim including leaders in the religion are silent when ISIS claims responsibility for another terrorist attack.
She has a valid argument that MSM clearly doesn't want people on the left to hear by labeling her a White Nationalist.
Ah 100% proof she's a white nationalist by liking an interview with David Duke the "leader" of the White Nationalist movement.
This is the difference between the cult like behavior on the left and conservatives on the right. If you retweet, like or share anything David Dukes says then you must be racists, bigot and a Nazi. David Duke has some interesting view points on the world that contradict the left's agenda so he's label a racist so people dismiss his views. People on the right like myself say he's got some good and some bad views but just because you agree with one of his views doesn't mean you're now a White Nationalist only people in a cult think that way.
You'd think she's the scum of the earth reading some of the crap in the article with most of it being speculation and lacking specific examples of racism. She does tackle culture and race specific topics in her podcasts but she approaches them with common sense and scientific approach(that left hates when you do that). She's only made like 5 podcasts and is basically just trying to get off the ground and build an audience but clearly she struck a nerve with the left and they are trying to shut her down.
I hope it back fires and she's 10 times bigger after this article than she would of ever been.
“White Nationalist” is the new “racist”. All that means is you are a Caucasian who loves the country you are from.
The mental gymnastics the left plays is insane.
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Relevance: Invite her to steemit!
Our Purpose
I am white, I married a white woman, so by Progressive Libtard Standards I am a racist
Or am I a Melatoninphobe, since the left is "phobic" about anything that does not fit their narrow view of what someone else is allowed to think?
Oh the Trans-Humanity!
Thanks HuffPo for clearing that up.
Such a diverse group of people of the at huffington post too.
You know Obama's 2012 re-election team looked just like that.
I cannot find the picture now but I remember tweeting about it.
By the way It seems your witness vote did not register.
Could you give it a scond try for me.
Go to https://steemit.com/~witnesses URL address then scroll down to Vote.
Or you may simply follow this link and click the Continue button to confirm your vote.
https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=libertyranger&approve=1
I noticed there isn't even one POC(Person of Color) at that editors meeting! How come? Were they all on vacation?
Great words! Couldn't agree more. It's been basically outlawed to have national pride.
I remember being taught in grade school (not that incredibly long ago) that this is called ethnocentrism, and it's just part of the human condition.
What concerns me more is the demonization of communication that seems to be happening. I think that the furthest extremes on each side should still be able to enjoy effective communication. Isn't that the reason for a two-party system?
Now moderates are not allowed to listen to extremists without being fully labeled and branded with that extremist's beliefs.
I wish we could all see that everyone has something of value to offer, even if it's buried beneath layers of bs.
It's all about labeling someone rather than attacking someones argument.
That's why I made this new account anonymous... ;)
Isn't this the teacher that said she saw what looked like police officers doing the shooting instead of that poor kid they are using as a patzy?
Nope, she works or rather use to work at a middle school.
So is she just another crisis actor or what?
Are you talking about this gal with the podcast?
cant agree there. Tribalism is a learned behavior taught by society and peers. Bring someone up in a mixed race society and they will not have the same preference for "their own tribe" because their definition does not include race.
As for Islam vs Christianity, there are plenty of violent examples when Christianity interpreted scripture to back their own agenda against other religions and also women. There are also plenty of peaceful Christians. To lump all believers into one group is ridiculous.
Whether or not the above article is fake or not, the arguments don't stand up to rational analysis imho.
If you live in America you live in a mixed race society. Are you arguing that the vast majority of Black people don't go to Black churches, Whites White Churches, and Latinos Latino Churches? They do. The more I am around coloreds, the less I want to be. I would suggest you are sheltered or want to be.
As for violence and religion, so what? Those Jewish born Atheist Communists who took over and ran Russia at least through the Stalin error killed at least 60 million. Mankind wages violence and war. Did you know the Crusaders were running a counter-strike into Islamic territory after the Muslims struck into Europe? The Inquisition? Catholicism was the religion of the Roman Empire: "The Holy Roman Church."
Christianity is bad for women? Women have their natural and proper role as a mother. It is written a mother is redeemed through her children. A woman who wants a career wants to free herself from her natural role. If that's what she wants, let her be free and alone. Cats can be her family. She is out only for herself so maybe the cats aren't the best idea.
She can see how good of care she gets from the island girls when she needs to go into a home after living for herself.
Maybe you personally should study the natural order of things. Dogs don't have bunny ears even if you put ersatz bunny ears on them.
Women have their natural and proper role as a mother??? ffs what country and era are you from? do you know the percentage of women who never marry? 17-20 percent. how many women never have children? almost 50 percent. women actually have friends, projects and careers. not all of them have cats. lmfao. percentage of people who go to church? 20%. Wonder what the other 80% do... hang out with their friends? My white mother hangs out with her black boyfriend. My mixed race cousin is marrying his Guatemalan fiance. MY best friend is Mexican. I suggest its you who are not only sheltered but ignorant of the facts. Maybe you should open your eyes.
I feel bad for you.
The problem with your Christianity vs Islam argument is that Christianity has and will reform it's behavior when culture norms change.
Islam refuses to reform and that's why women are forced to wear burkas and hijabs.
I disagree. I think that norms are changing now, but like any change, its slow to be perceived and accepted. And despite changing norms, hate crimes against LGBT groups by Christians are still a thing. There's no black and white where Christians are always the good guys and Islamist's are always the terrorists.
You should do some research and find out how many Christians majority nations have laws against being gay vs. Muslim majority nations that have laws against being gay. Hint it's quite shocking.
i'm not unaware of the facts. I'm just saying it's the pot calling the kettle black. I don't support discrimination based on race or religion. and as long as you make an argument based on those factors, I cannot agree.
there's very sharp contrast between the two hence why I think you should do more research.
She's just a postmodern problem. Very dense, very self-righteous. She doesn't realize she's part of a "permanent revolution" culture. Possible reprobate.