Or instead of gold you could buy farmland, housing or other needed and cash flowing assets. The article is spot on, but holding money in perpetuum is not always the answer, growth and steady income for old age may be. (you do realize that pensions and social security may not be enough if even in existence).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, it's also assuming that folks diversify according to their own investment philosophies. The focus is just on increasing ounces, regardless of price, where we might be in a boom/bust cycle or other goals.
Well said... and in that regard, there may be a day when the other assets mentioned may also be traded for an increased ounces.
I get your point and have done this in the past actually, not as much as I would have like, thanks again.