The Irresponsible Bot Owners Contributing to the Demise of Steem

in #irresponsible6 years ago (edited)

Below are the irresponsible bid bot owners allowing @jerrybanfield to use their "service" to promote bullshit posts about Steem/Steemit to the top of trending, discouraging future and current investors.

@appreciator

@postpromoter

@rocky1

@smartsteem - BLACKLISTED!

@upme - BLACKLISTED!

@buildawhale - BLACKLISTED!

@therising

@booster - BLACKLISTED!

Congratulations, you all have no fucking spine! Your current income will soon go to shit because YOU are allowing YOUR bots to be used to trash the very platform you expect to earn from!

#blacklisthisass

Sort:  
There are 5 pages
Pages

Blacklisted him from Smartsteem.com

Should have done that as soon as I found out about his bathroom video. But better late than never.

@therealwolf it is a lesson for others to follow rule and regulation for discipline community .

You are right
am agree with you
Thanks...

Yes brother I did

I like how everyone obeys to berniesanders. Who is this guy?

We need more Bernies and less bid bot owners!

Lol, i have seen just the NSFW cover and that was very weird and perved...

I thought it was funny.

No, it wasn't at all. I have read that he was in rehab treatment in the past due his porn addictions. He must be very carefull doing that kind of kinky shit because it only work for the ladies...

It definitely did not work for this lady. I am sorry I even saw the thumbnail and clicked out quick.

mam follow me back plz.. i follow you

follow me i follow

Follow me on steemauto.com and I will follow you there also.

for sure - people gonna pay big bucks if you got titties and then stand up for your right to do it too. otherwise expect the hillbilly brigade to burn down your house and get the cops to help as well ;-)

Agreed. It's women's choice and the choice of everyone. However once people get into that kind of business they must measure themselves about what they doing because it become always viral...

@maikelblogo respective human conscience is required for good community. better to be away from those people who don't respect others.

One thing is making a good community and respect each other and other different thing is talking about what is wrong with some people. Next time, you must be educated about some topics and then you can make a good conclusion about...

ifollow you u will back follow me.

your late lol make your Owen video

I just follow you please follow me back

I just follow you please follow me back

i need vote for vote ? can you help

hey here is our old pal using them and promoting ponzies again
https://steemit.com/ethereum/@ethnow/now-9-4-eth-hold-to-earn-rewards

gooooooooooooooood

Right. agreed

I am upvoting you plz help me also by upvoting and commenting me regularly I will also gove you response back soon..

I am new for steemit plish gide me.

Don't comment beg and spell your words correctly.

1。 maybe search more info about steemit in a language that you are comfortable. if you can't find any, i suggest you start one yourself =)

  1. don't spam, don't beg

Good luck

@cn-reader good advise. good language is for respective community

@devam Go to youtube and see videos about steemit.you will get all the information about it.

You can remove @buildawhale from that list, he's fucking out of here.
I've been wanting to do this for a while.

https://steemit.com/buildawhale/@buildawhale/buildawhale-blacklist-update-special-edition

I appreciate you and smartsteem for blacklisting such a powerful guy. This is why I gave you witness vote last week. And also it is remarkable that Jerrybanfield's witness position has now been dropped down to 31. Is there any way to bring him further down? I think there are many good witnesses who haven't reached top 100.

Update- I have a doubt about this as well. when you remove such powerful upvotes, will you be returning their money back? If not, what will you do with that Steem/SBD? Just curious!

For your information, to ignore or act upon, as you see fit.

Just in case you have something against positivity-spewing bullshit artists and self-help gurus, making promises they cannot keep, we would like to point out to you the work of the trending author @chbartist, who just published this gem:

I'm going to leave this post there, with a simple yet powerful promise. If we stay positive, if we learn to control that fear, that panic and work on our personal development, before you know it summer will have arrived.

His last three posts are so full of drivel that reading them makes our eyes water, yet they are high up on the trending page.

Kind regards,

The Church of Piglet.

The fact that anyone can/will put up some crap content (that benefits no one) and buy bots to get noticed is hilarious.. it's like those hopeless people on Instagram that buy their followers, anyone with any real intelligence laughs at them (until it becomes to pathetic to laugh at anymore). Of course none of this is surprising though since people are so addicted to artificial everything these days

Unfortunately, you can see there are tons of sheep in this community (they all follow Jerry).

That website should be named Sheepit.

I follow Jerry because he is interesting, like Jerry Lewis.

When everybody gots da same idea u know wut comes next right lol?

Many even follow @chbartist. We live in interesting times.

Thanks everyone for your comments. My comment wasn't meant to single any one person out (that would be a lot of singling out haha), and not everyone that buys followers/bots has a crap post. I was just mentioning in general that it's very common and ruins the point of being on here. It's discouraging to look at any top posts because of it.

This problem isn't unique to @jerrybanfield everyone is doing this. If Jerry went away tomorrow the problem would still persist. This is a systematic problem, not a problem with one user

I try my best in focusing on what I can change in the world. I believe in family first and local community values, offline first. The Internet has no walls. Just kidding. The Internet has walls, too. But it can be a lot different than the real world. So, I am on the Internet to influence others. Can we really stop everybody we dislike online? Maybe not always.

Totally! Never is just one person.

First we need a lot of mistakes before we can build a stable systems.
(Or I just build on my own and improve on it if it dies.

add masternodes and your good to go ;)

Jerrybanfield is struggling. It is evident in all of his content. I know many of you don't like him, and you don't have to support him, but I think we should at least offer him compassion as he is a human being like the rest of ua

Posted using Partiko Android

true he's human 2

Isn't it better that they let him waste his money and then remove their vote from his post?
I know that's what @booster did.
(oh i see the new one he has trending now...ugh, this guy)

I think its a slippery slope when we start deciding who is worthy of being on steemit, who is worthy of earning money. If Jerry went away tomorrow this problem would still exist a new person or new group of people would just become the ones to profit from it. This is a systematic problem not a jerry problem. I also find it troubling that we all bitch and moan about youtube and ohter platforms yet we try to do the same things they do

that might be the best comment so far, personally ive been on steemit for months and i never heard about the guy until this week ... bubble universe , you cant have free speech if its not absolutely free, but monetary damage is another topic i suppose, i dont know enough about it to voice my opinion on the matter, i pay little attention to witnesses since most of them i read so far are quite content fascists.
I actually decided to unvote most of those, b/c i usually did b/c someone asked, i dont like politics and central authority (which is what this system is really) but i'll go over their blogs one by one at my own snailpace and label them on a scale from intellectual anarchist over neutral to content nazi ... and bast my votes on that from now

interesting read anyway

Nobody decided he isn't worthy of being on SteemIt. They decided to not sell him a product. Voting Power. The people who own the bots are selling voting power and many of them have decided not to sell it to Jerry.

That is totally different than running him off the site or banning him from saying what he wants to say.

Okay but what have you to say about this. People whine about Youtube right, Youtube doesn't not allow anyone to use their service, they simply block monetization. That's a pretty even argument about not allowing people to use bots. On youtube people are still free to post content, they just dont want to do it if they can't earn money the same way jerry can still post he just can't use voting bots.

Apples and oranges. A vote bot is a business, not a service. they sell you votes. The bot owners have the right to decide if they want to sell you a service. A person does not have a right to buy from the business. The Bid Bots are not preventing jerry from posting or doing what he wants. he is still allowed to post as much crap as he wants, just like I am allowed to post as much crap as I want.

You can not force a bid bot owner to sell to everyone, regardless of content. There are bots that refuse to sell to NSFW content. Are they wrong for that refusal? It's is their business to be run as they see fit. I myself do not like them, so I don't use them. later down the road I may use them, but I am not much into buying reputation or votes.

The same way Youtube and Adsnese are both businesses and have the right to not offer their service to others. I realize your not saying this but the overall feeling of Steemit seems to be fuck youtube steemit rocks and in reality both have a way of censoring people and both are well within their rights to do so

censoring jerry would be systematically flagging every post and every comment he makes to take it below the level required to be visible.

Removing his ability to be seen on steemit is censorship. This, this isn't wanting your product (bid bot) to be associated with someone like Jerry.

youtube censorship is a blackbox..

steemit censorship is public .. at least you could draw attention to being unfairly censored here. on youtube, you are just fucked.

here you can be saved. i was. after being unfairly downvoted simply for stating alternative facts and asking questions. I found myself losing reputation right and left. but I reached out in posts to steemcleaners and others and posted about being screwed. and a whale came and helped me.

i still kinda fuss about needing to be saved, but then maybe this is just as it is, if your cause is righteous, then someone can and probably will help you. if it is not... you might sink.

@rulesforrebels you have a point. WHen a post like this is made to influence the business owners by giving them a bad business wrap that will make them feel compelled to blacklist him then it becomes a sensorship.

I am too new on steemit so dont want to get myself entangled on the politics here but alot of these posts are personal based and not community.

People have a very strange sense of censorship. What does the ability to buy a vote or have a vote sold to you have to do with censorship? There are thousands of post on steemit that have never paid for a vote. Are they all censored post because they did not pay for a vote?

it has become a tradition.

saludos @booster me gusta mucho su trabajo

Alpacabowl.gif

a visual of how this is all helping make the world the Utopia that stuff promised
happy friday beautiful peeps <3

Jerry reminds me of a hot bucket of vomit that just commited a hate crime.

Lol!! That shit is gold.

I agree they are ruining Steemit :(

He was already Red-listed and his vote removed, you can remove @booster from your list, Banfield has been set on the blacklist now for a month so he can cool off.

At this rate, he'll be blacklisted by just about every bot in no time :P

@Berniesanders This and the others abusing the system are also driving users away.. It wouldn't surprise me, if they end up removing bot voting, and keep it to whales only. As for the other abusing the system, they should have a system to block any outgoings, including any savings. it seems harsh, but users shouldn't take the mick!., so if and when an offender creates a new account, they'll get fed up eventually, if mass repeating their abuse to the site.

I actually made a post about this very thing today. To me this is a systematic problem, if Jerry went away this problem would still persist. Here's my response to this post

https://steemit.com/steemit/@rulesforrebels/don-t-hate-the-player-hate-the-game-or-addressing-why-steemit-sucks-or-response-to-berniesanders

i'll check it out in a sec.

I wish I could earn something on this site - there is no support for original music painting or writing here

Steemit isn't about creating quality content, steemit is about learnign what upvote bots to use, who to become friends with, what networks to join. Its about playing the game. That's not necessarily a good or bad things its just what it is

You are using bid bots on almost all your posts and complaining that you are unable to earn anything from this website. Most of the curation communities don't like people using bid bots. But at the same time it is indeed very difficult to earn something from this website unless you have at most patience.

I have been consistently writing a lot without using bid bots or anything. My earning is also poor only. I just learnt that I have to be a bit lucky. That's all.

Seriously? Then you hang out in the wrong places.. I curate for @smacommunity and @c-squared for example and all the above are being supported.. all of them... Very curious about your content if you are mentioning the maybe most rewarded tags here on Steemit as not supportive..

I think what @daydreams4rock is getting at is that Steemit isn't about quality content, its about playign the game. Nothing wrong with that, but its the reality. On youtube quality content alone can go viral. Here on steemit you need to know the right tags to use, the right people to befriend the right upvote bots to pay.

I've had posts that get 150 upvotes which is a clear indicication people enjoyed the content but I still only earn 47 cents where as someone else creates a shit piece of content that gets 7 votes and they earn $120

"On youtube quality content alone can go viral."

And you would make pennies, and then maybe even have some of your vids demonetised if they are political in nature.

Making money online isn't simple period so I'm not gonna knock steemit too hard for that and while Youtube does have it's problems I've made WAY more on Youtube than I've ever made here.

The whole pennies on Youtube thing is kinda a myth, at times I have over a $20 CPM, I havn't seen my CPM under $15 in a long time, I would say $17 is about average for me. My content appeals to certain advertisers of SAAS software, ecommerce platforms etc. It's very true however that more general types of content ie a vlog isn't going to monetize well. There are Youtubers who are basically famous who are still working restaurant jobs but its because while they do have a shit ton of views, none of those views are really catered towards anything so maybe a company like Pepsi will say shit we/'ll pay $1 per 1000 views just for brand recognition but your not going to have anyone really willing to pay a lot.

On the flip side an appliance repair guy who starts a channel and show syou how to diagnose a problem with your dishwaasher and how to fix it is going to get very high CPM because anyone watching that video is almost guranteed to buy a part to fix their machine so advertisers will pay more.

Not saying Youtube is perfect and not saying steemit is shit but there's no denying while it has issues Youtube is a far superior platform if for no other reason than the algorithm alone. Youtube knows content I wanna see that I dont even know that I wanna see. Steemit I have to do a TON of searching to find something that interests me.

It's so painful and discouraging, doesn't even spur someone to produce an outstanding content that would end up going unnoticed

Can be the case that he meant that. And yes I agree on that, you got to get noticed, or spend tons of money here. I don't do that though, nothing in my wallet comes from fiat investments, only earnings here. So it is possible, really! But it's harder and harder getting noticed, totally agree on this .. lots of bullshit trending topics here, from people that only post crap. Just in case he needed some tips, I did take the time to look at some posts, to see if I can contribute in any way as he is also using bots to have higher payouts, and that will make other groups not vote you. Everyone has different skills, and desires, just trying to help him out...

I used to think that @berniesanders was the bad guy instead of the fun guy ;) But I have a different view on that by now, and that jerrybanshit video kicked me even further to the other side .. By the way @berniesanders why don't you drop a better entry for @comedyopenmic ? Just to show Jerry who's boss??? And if you do, do it after tomorrow if you please, so I can judge it lol

He probably won't reply to you, because you've spelled his name wrong :D
it's @berniesanders not @berniesaunders
Not trying to be a grammar nazi, just mentioning it because he might not see your reply in his notifications.

Fully agree with what you said though ;-)

No offence taken @daan I am still noy fully operational that's obvious damn... changed it.. thanks grammar nazi :-)

@rulesforrebels i had to upvpte you.
Now riddle me how this works. I have seen some people with 1000 upvotes and 30$ and another with 50 and heck a lot of $$$

Is it knowing which bots pay big or is it knowing the whales who upvote you? I am very new on this but it is something i have been following and can't understand

This is probably my biggest problem with Steemit and I've actually written a couple posts about this topic. So I have had posts that get 150 plus upvotes so to me that means the community as a whole liked my content, however that post will only earn me like $3 where as I'll see another post with 7 upvotes that makes $120.

I understand that votes from people with higher steem power are more valuable but it seems really skewed that a post with overwhelming support ie 150 upvotes can earn nothing while one with 7 can earn hundreds of dollars. The balance of power is way out of wack.

I dont know a perfect solution. At first I thought make an algorithm so that after a certain volume of votes a post earns some type of bonus or something to kind of balance out the whale power however people will just use upvote bots or buy accounts and upvote stuff in large numbers. I'm not really sure what the solution is. Even sites like Youtube wrestle with this, they used to rank stuff based on upvotes and then realized its too easy to use bots to upvote so had to go to watch time as a main factor in their algorithm

@steemmonsters is doing tons of writing stuff.

Couldn't "demise" be the wrong term in this situation?
Looking at things purely optimistically?

Steem costing near or under a dollar, ideally.. would be a good thing.. to me..

Now if I spend a decent bit of money on it, while it's cheap, I can get a good amount of money's worth out of it. Whereas when it's 3.. 4.. 6.. 20$ each.. I can get far less steem for my $.

Knowing it has potential to go back to at least 2$.. I'd say steem dropping like hotcakes would be very beneficial to the community as a whole. Money smart people would have only ever had what they could afford to lose in steem and it would've been a fraction of their total income/available money at any given time.. and they'd be secure in their lives outside of steemit and not depending on an ultimately unreliable earning. (Things can happen in an instant and change your fate on posting platforms.)

Although I agree that it's up to each party to decide what they want to do, I also believe that steem/sbd price dropping very low, is beneficial to everyone who's been holding out so they can have a bigger say, a bigger bang for their buck, if you will, in the fight that currently is, freedom of speech vs. those looking to abuse bots vs. the stifling of content.... Idk, it's an all out brawl on here from what I can tell.

Peace to you all though, I wish you all the best. I use @therealwolf's service for vote selling because when I did my research, I saw he was truly making steps to cut the abuse, as have my friends. However large or small the part, the abuse needs to stop. There needs to be much better quality content being promoted and a lot less of the bs. We have a platform to represent here.. What type of society do we want to be? What type of wealth, in both money and intellectual value.. do we want to have here?

Just some thoughts. :)

Excellent post. I had no idea this kind of B.S went on. Thanks for the warning. I'd love to see some kind of system to weed out fake accounts and manipulation. Until then, I guess we have to rely on users like you to sound the alarm bell.

This post has received a 100.00 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @ngc.

I just wanted to pump this one up, I find it ironically funny :))

lol @booster is the top upvoter on this post, 2nd is @buildawhale. I must have misunderstood the point of the post, this is confusing.

No, you have understood correctly. There are magic things that happen here.

Read the post and top comments again

Its not okay to upvote your content if its shitty, who decides whether your content is shitty is the unknown here. it is okay to upvote your content complaining about others upvoting shitty content lol.

i actually made a response to this post and used bid bots to upvote a post i wrote about bid bots being a problem lol

https://steemit.com/steemit/@rulesforrebels/don-t-hate-the-player-hate-the-game-or-addressing-why-steemit-sucks-or-response-to-berniesanders

Promobot does not blacklist anyone. @JerryBanfield is welcome to use our service.

fair world. ill check your bot too

@promobot Thanks for the upvote of $10 when I sent 10 sbd. That vote is worth less than 2 sbd. I appreciate it. Even though it says you cant get less than 1% roi, i got a 75% loss. Cool cool.

The voting bots are making a big disfavour to the STEEM community. I know, lot of people are misusing it, and we should rally against such cases... The proposal to remove a penalty from flagging someone is so wrong, and it is extremely wrong to get $1000 dollars from making such proposal...

Abusers should be flagged and if they reach a particular level, they should be allowed to post only once in a week and in extreme cases, move funds from their account to a common seem account.....steem/eos are all centralized in many ways!!! 21 witness node controlling the whole network!!!! how could that be decentralized

whats abuse and who gets to decide who's an abuser?

gaming the system, writing post every hour and using bitbots to upvote and get all steem rewards and many abuse. i guess the steem community can and should come up with a guide line .This free ride is screwing the platform

Only 21 nodes?

read the steem white paper/blue paper

Bid bots make 1% of the votes but take 40% of the reward pool.

Fortunately i was not part of his weird bathroom fun, was thinking of blacklisting him from a long time but enough is enough, will not support these type of posts anymore.

Blacklisted and Unvoted from @appreciator.

its a slippery slope just arbitrarily deciding who creates content that doesn't deserve bots. the vast majority of stuff i see on trending and hot being upvoted is shit

What are they doing wrong? I am using one of the bots to delegate to and earn income, how are they ruining the platform? Actually curious...

Are you against boost or supporting boost, I'm really very confuse. Once i invest on my posts to boost my earning but it seems useless. @berniesanders

Its about a scammer using those bots to get up to Trending, not about you. Nothing wrong with your content except you're clearly not scammy enough for Trending.

ultimately who gets to decide what content is worthy of upvotes then?

You do.

I can control who I upvote and who I don't but when bot owners start controlling who can use their service, I mean yeah it's their right to do it's their bot, but were also starting to give a single person arbitrary control over who's allowed to promote their content on here and who's not. If I dislike someone I can now use that power to not let them use my bot? I can but is that right?

I just find it hypocritical and funny how people on here bitch and moan so much about other platforms cencosring people, promoting a certain type of content, and then they do the same stuff over here.

I also just wanted to point out that I think jerry is only a piece of this problem so many other people are doing the same thing, hot and trending are flooded with garbage, jerry just gets mentioned because he does this better than most others and has more power to do it to a bigger extent.

Bot owners have every right to determine who can and can't use their service. It's their vested SP, not the community's.

more power to them. the community i imagine could decide we dont want this platform using bots, i imagine a hard fork could be done and there goes there power and money.

my point is once we start allowing a single person to dictate who can get ahead and who cant its a slippery slope. what if i had some powerful friends on here and i said hey you know that @swelker101 guys eggplant on axe handles, that's fucking dumb, lets all downvote his stuff 100% or lets not let him use any of our bots, then it really sucks to be you.

basically what im trying to say is everyone came here bitching and moaning about how bad youtube is and i see many of those same people participating in the same type of shit youtube does but its okay because its them doing it and not a corporation.

Scams, like art, like beauty, subjectively, is/are in the eye(s) of the beholder, hehe.

True true. One person's scam is another person's business. That's part of the problem here.

@guiltyparties, is it okay then for someone with a lot of powers to hold multiple accounts and upvote their own posts and comments with the said fake accounts?

I even noticed a powerful person like you give an upvote to same things you discourage.
I believe you are part of steemitclearners who discourage spamming and i am supprised to see you give a full upvote to a "lol" comment.

i think what is going on here is fight of the titans and the strongest only will survive.
To the weak and powerless the best we can do is watch and not poke our noses in to these fights. one down vote on my tiny account or blacklist and i am dead . lol

You think I'm a powerful account? I do upvote a lot of people who are either appealing Cheetah or are trying to learn to use Steemit.

With self-voting there's a few differences between the types. There's people who legitimately made and financed their accounts, they fall under one class, lets say Class A. There's people who are abusing the free delegation @steem gives out and creating giant armies of accounts only for upvoting without any investment, lets say Class B. There's also people who do a mixture of the two to make a giant botnet to publish automated copy/paste content on all accounts, and then cross-upvote them, those are Class C.

The general consensus is Class A are using their own stake, Class B lose their delegation and are rendered useless, and Class C end up getting their scammed rewards removed. It's the Class C ones that are completely demolishing the reward pool but because they're not that visible and their accounts are hard to find, most people don't realize they're there. They're the reason new people can't get accounts without waiting.

That all being said, if we use your example of an LOL comment, the Class A account may say that once in a while and upvote it. Class B and C accounts will auto-post it 100 times an hour and hide it in old posts. One LOL here and there, supported by the person's own investment (SP they bought or earned) is one thing and the 100 LOLs, also known as 'comment farming' is another.

Also, as a user you do have the right to upvote your own comments and posts. That's you using your stake as you want. It's your right and freedom, as long as you're not 'comment farming' as above. (At that point it becomes so detrimental to the entire ecosystem it must be stopped.) If anyone tells you you're not allowed to vote on your own work, they're full of shit.

Hope I answered your questions.

I sent 1 SBD to Randowhale and never got an upvote ) :

Any way you can return all the funds I sent to that upvote bot? It said it was awake, but I never got an upvote/return. I really don't like upvote bots now

Damn bots.... Donald Trump needs to build a wall.... WITH THE BONES OF THE PEOPLE THAT USE THESE BOTS!

I like walls. Family first. Local communities second. Country third. World fourth.

What movie was that where Will Ferrel says MOM! WHERE'S MY MEATLOAF? FUUUCK!

Probably all of his movies including the Lego Movie, every meatloaf is awesome.

I don't likes to use bots in my account. I geniunly repect the content creators which work hard to make there post better. but unfortunately these bots will change the game 😔

It is funny that the op uses voting bots and also owns one, while your comment disagrees with that :))

I do not run a bot.

All of the people in my life are as predictable in their “loops” as these bots.

Are you watching Westworld?

Thank you @berniesanders for the post you made in order to warn us not to use them, I will be sure to not used them under any circumstances in order to not get scammed. Thank you for warning me about it. :)

i followed them before long time,,but Blacklisted are the fucking bots that don't give good profit..lol
@appreciator
@postpromoter
@rocky1
@smartsteem - BLACKLISTED!
@upme
@buildawhale - BLACKLISTED!
@therising
@booster
@minnowbooster

Wrong. Blacklisted are those who have blacklisted jerrybanfield.

Bots are promotional tools, not your own personal cash register.

But it's your personal cash register, right?

I knew this guy he always got an A+ in carpentry - for hitting the nail on the head.
;-) well played

Blacklist!!!!!!!!!

torches-and-pitchforks.gif

The decentralised hillbilly brigade

Its about time, we (humans NOT bots) should make our own upvote, curate content, help fellow steemians. It is this automation that resulted to complication to those affected accounts.

With regards to content, if you think, the content is trash, so don't vote for it, and rather look for post that suits your taste, and give higher % of upvote, so that that content creator can be inspired to produce more quality content.

Flagging other users on the grounds that his/her post is rubbish, is totally unfair if not a form of bullying/anarchy of the powerful(those with bigger sp).

Steemit is for content creation, to express their ideas, feelings, helping others to learn something, by suppressing a person to post his content, is equivalent of killing the criminal even before he can commit a crime.

Glad to see half of these already blacklisted #blacklisthisass

I am very happy watch your ernining so good luck 😊👍

@berniesanders now m follow you please given me follow thank you

Thats a bad news sir.
I also agree with you.
Thanks for sharing @berniesanders.

Omg!! they are the worst

@berniesanders you are also using @appreciator for the promotion of this post.

I hope these people will disappear here

That's a trap, how can they do something like that, instead of winning their steem in a clean way?

i wonder..

you two have no idea of what is going on here and i would suggest just stay out of these big boys fights. If you want to see your account die keep up commenting and hurt feelings of the wrong whale around here. lol
Your account reputation will be blacklisted and before you know it you will be -ve reputation

Hiii @berniesanders, it's great to know about Whales/Bots, who have power to increase or decrease our Steemit power,
I this comment also help to save our account by bots to be #blacklist.
Thanks @berniesanders for sharing and plzz don't miss to follow @devkapoor423, and support @devkapoor423 by your upvote and comments on blogs

@berniesanders You are wrong because most of people use it

@berniesanders i m very regretfull to resteemed @jerrybanfield post. now i understand the whole agenda of this post. Thanks buddy. now i resteem your post on my blog.

@berniesanders this is best action what they needed. i like it.

Congratulations @berniesanders! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Your post got the highest payout on one day

Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard!


Participate in the SteemitBoard World Cup Contest!
Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD
Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: @good-karma and @lukestokes


Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Needful action has been taken.That's great!!!

I'm respect to content creator i know how to make articel is difficult to wrriting it.. So don't use bot guys

Bro if you want any upvote in steemit you have to pay for it. lol
Even this post has been upvoted using the same listed bot services. lmao

I thought the same when i joined but leant real quick its a survival for the fittest

Sory i'm newbi on steemit i'll still need explore what upvote is and more feature.

@berniesanders
thank man for information
blacklist all of them

Posted using Partiko Android

😛😜😝

Steemit is more and more getting a mere Manufactury of Fakes and Clowns.............

Ouch! Such a bad news.

There are 5 pages
Pages