You might want to add that while you're making those sentences, you should repeat them aloud to the point where you can say them smoothly.
Then move on to another sentence using the same grammar pattern, substituting different subject or object, or possibly verb. Then repeat that until you can do it with that grammar pattern and any random combination of subject/object/verb and not having to write it down for a cue.
If you don't have a teacher with whom you can check your sentences, you can also cheat and use the google method: Google exactly the sentence you just made and see how many exact matches there are. If you have more than a hundred thousand exact matches, it's probably valid grammar. It might not mean what you think it means, but it's valid grammar.
I thought I inferred all that, but I guess I could have been clearer.
Haha oh the google method. I’ll just randomly ask acnative speaker, if I can’t find one I’ll fish in a Facebook group or I guess now I’d fish at Steemit.
You mean imply? An inference is a conclusion made based on observation... You probably meant implied...
It's possibly obvious to other readers, but I can be dense sometimes... and I suppose a second mention is more useful than someone else as dense as me missing it the first go around.
Yeah, but as a quick sanity check it doesn't require poking a human.
So you’d rather poke a search engine? It really comes down to who you like poking more and who enjoys being poked more.
Some times, late at night, when you're alone and trying to just get things done fast, you don't always want to rely on another person. Sure, most of the time you will, but you know, on those types of occasions, then a machine will do the job just fine.
Plus you can always do both.