I have to dispute this. Given there is no such thing as "deadly viruses" or "contagion," what They did was rebrand the flu (along with a few gunshots and fatal falls and such) to get the fear rolling. I know this because flu deaths, in the many hundreds of thousands a year through 2019. In 2020, flu deaths dropped to less than 2,000. (The flu is a seasonal detox...)
They used Their media to sell a "disease" that does not exist.
The weapon is and was always the death jab.
The End of Germ Theory: https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8
Despite any posthumous libels one might heap upon Pasteur, I have myself perceived animalcules with my own eyes, peering through microscopes. As a biologist, I utterly deny and reject your claim that neither pathogen nor contagion exist, and, frankly, am saddened that the necessity of rejecting the deranging propaganda overlords afflict us with is only possible to some by wholesale rejection of anything that seems to come from that direction at all.
I urge you to test your baseless delusions yourself, so that you can reconsider their source as from yourself, rather than as coming from enemies you must reject. You do not have to inflict deadly pathogens on people to ascertain the simple truth that pathogens exist, and at least not be so deranged as to misapprehend the very foundation of biology to such ridiculous degree.
Please do not respond until you have.
Thanks!
I would not call them "baseless..." And I have looked into this in depth. I have seen that no "animalcules" of virii are seen directly from a host, and that the cells must be starved and poisoned to get them to break down, providing spots of debris which are pointed to and called "the virus."
I am also aware the We have seen and mapped the genome of every living thing - but have none of that for "virus genomes," ALL of which were created by taking bits of genetic material They found and stitched together in silico, calling the result the "virus genome," and then patenting them.
So did You see these "virii" directly from a host sample?
As for contagion, study after study exist showing a 100% inability to pass illness from the sick to the well. As that graphic suggests, thousands and thousands of test subjects could not be made sick by having Them spend time with the ill, get sneezed, coughed, and spat upon, etc.
And Pasteur DID state in His journals, published posthumously, that He used mercury to prove it for His buddy, Rockefeller.
I ponder who is deluded...
You dodge and weave to attempt to appear as if you make reasoned and consistent arguments, but despite now claiming only viruses are at issue, you have stated that contagion and pathogens don't exist. You refute germ theory itself.
Go be deluded somewhere else.
Um... Offering facts is "dodging and weaving???" I guess to One clinging to indoctrination, that might seem so.
And absolutely I refute Rockefeller's "germ theory."
Though I do not expect You to watch, I offer an examination of the many claims.
The End of Germ Theory: https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8
I am not deluded, having studied these things for decades... Maybe open Your mind a wee bit to what the CIA director, William Casey said back in the 1980's:
“We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”
Did you ever just look at stuff in a microscope? I don't care what Rockefellers or CIA Directors say. I literally looked at stuff in a microscope, and was not fooled by words.
Look for yourself, and trust no one elses words. Do that, and the truth will be yours to tell. Until you do, you're just repeating hearsay.
Yes, I have. But just seeing bits does not = proof of anything but that there are bits. And when it was shown that exosomes and some "deadly viruses" were identical... I had to ponder deeply. Other "deadly virus" bits have been shown to be debris emitted by dying cells. In fact, Dr. Stefan Lanka did the "virus proof" stuff - starving and poisoning cells - with both "sick" People's cells and "well" People's cells - and got identical "viruses" (or rather, dead cell debris) from both.
And I guess reading papers and listening to doctors that question the Big P-HARM-a narrative is a poor choice. I should look instead at dead cell debris and know there are "viruses..."
Point is, it's someOne's word We are trusting that the bits We see are "viruses."
The Truth About Viruses: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a
If all you saw in a microscope was 'bits' you didn't do much with it, and that not well. I will say this: I am certain that what I have seen in microscopes are living creatures. I am a biologist. I am familiar with how ecosystems function, and how life feeds on life. Those little creatures I have seen certainly eat, and undoubtedly eat larger things. I see that fungi eat trees, mold eats fruit I let go bad, rats eat corpses, and that pathogens eating us is absolutely certain to be happening beyond any doubt.
I'm not trusting anyone for the information on which I base my assessment of biology and germ theory.
You're denying that there are little tiny things that eat us, and that's just ridiculously stupid.
Go Away.