NASA definitely staged what we saw as the moon landing.
There is too much evidence of it.
The films look like cheesy B rated movies now. Especially if you know what errors to look for.
Did we go to the moon? Probably. There is too much evidence that we did. But what we found up there is under the tightest security.
Notice how astronauts react when asked to swear on the bible
But, we shouldn't expect any different from an organization that was started by a dark occultist. (Occult, meaning to hide, to obscure.)
So much evidence that you cant show any.
What are you going on about? Have you investigated at all?
Things like a mirror that we bounce lazers off of to determine atmospheric light scattering.
One of the most striking is the art of a certain astronaut.
The US also has flying saucers. And the moon isn't what we are told.
Read Richard Hoagland https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1360067.Dark_Mission and you will understand more of what I talk about.
(I see now why you didn't know, all of the search engines burried Richard Hoagland. The most prolific writer on space conspiracies, and never once came up under a generic search)
Asked for evidence and you went crazy. :D Says a enough about you.
Your replies are missing context.
So, to me, they are ambiguous. I have no clue what you are trying to say.
I think that you are trying to go off on a piece that Mr Berwick said, about how the astronauts react harshly to criticism. But this is assuming that there is not a great deal to hide, or that at any moment they may attempt suicide.
So, you attack with a "show the evidence"... If we actually met, I could literally bury you in evidence, both for and against. Then I could bury you even further with books that are not in the dichotomous camp of did we or didn't we.
If we actually want to start a discussion, we would first need to talk about which piles of evidences we need want to discuss. So that we are on the same page. That anyone might state that there is no evidence hasn't even looked.
Hang on, so you think we put humans on the moon, but NASA didn't show us the real footage??
If the reason you had to get to the moon first was to get to the ruins first, would you show footage of it?
If you knew what the earth and moon really were, and your entire mission was occulting, would you show any real footage?
Things like, you can't see stars in space. If shown to be true, what does that do to every science book?
NASA constantly hides things. They have never, not once that I am aware of, given straight feed from any of their space ships or satellites.
Many say this is because of UFOs that visit them all the time. (or fly by) And others, its because of what is really there: Richard Hoagland https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1360067.Dark_Mission
Many many NASA photos are known to be fake. NASA is known to reuse old photos as new photos. NASA is known to lose photos. NASA is known to deny that they created a photo, when many say they did.
NASA a group that does such secret work, that they had to be a public company so that they are never under the freedom of information act.
Of course the moon landings were faked. I love how the trolls roll out "ruins" and "flat earth" everytime someone has his head straight enough to question the moon landings.
I just love how simpletons finally see enough evidence to say the moon landing footage was hoaxed, and then can't believe anything deeper or stranger happened. I love it because once the door is opened a little, they get more and more evidence. And soon, they will be like me, knowing everything I was taught in school is wrong. Everything! All of it.