The more I share some of my ideas the more I'm getting these sorts of reactions. I'm showing I guess a new kind of moral system, a sort of computational morality which relies on analysis of public opinion. This is the sort of morality that I predict would be successful in a radically transparent environment. Imagine if everyone can see your decisions? Don't you think your primary stakeholders will make some kind of judgment about your decisions? So if your decisions impact them, then shouldn't you bring them into the decision?
Our society is incredibly bizarre and illogical. On the one hand in our society there is this belief in the individual when it is convenient. When it's a moral decision then the individual is expected to make it alone, to take the negative consequences alone, etc. On the other hand if the decision pays off immensely then the group often steps in with: "No individual made it on their own" and so on.
So which is it? If there is really no such thing in the pragmatic sense a self made individual, then every individual is made up of whomever and whatever influences them. This means you are whoever has influence over you for better or for worse.