You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The secrets of why girls go to the bar. 女孩去酒吧的秘密。

in #life8 years ago (edited)

This is an NOT an "introduce yourself" post. It is a story about a bar in Beijing and why the girls go there. The food and the ambiance and the view.

Please remove your flag. This post could be an excellent introduction of steemit to Beijing office girls (who ALL have smartphones). Adoption in China could take off.

Sort:  

even in her introduceyourself she posted no verification:
https://steemit.com/life/@sweetsssj/how-do-girls-live-well-in-china
unless she verifies I won't remove it. @anyx @cheetah
she obviously loves taking pictures so taking one holding a piece of paper wth steemit written on it shouldn't be much trouble.

@indominon you're @onceuponatime (and a few other whale nicks), as can be seen from your wallet and also who upvoted your "top reply" to help you bank on this thread.
you upvoted even her bogus unverified intro (same names involved: onceuponatime,erath,bue)
https://steemit.com/life/@sweetsssj/how-do-girls-live-well-in-china
so I think it's becoming clear who's behind this "sweetsssj" sham . good luck.

I am not "behind" this post. I saw it, and saw an opportunity for steemit to make very good publicity in the Beijing market if it got a large payout (similar to the great publicity from @dollarvigilante's highly rewarded post. If steemit goes viral in China then steemit rewards will be all the greater for content creators.

I don't know what your skill set is, but it probably does not include successful marketing or business development.

You have flagged this post because of some personal vendetta or witchhunt. That is not cool.

I will be flagging all your future posts until you remove this flag.

it's you who's flagging me for personal vendetta and censorship. I've got nothing against anyone.
I just don't believe it's her (as we speak she still hasn't verified, and 3 days have passed since her intro) . if she verified I'd be glad to remove flag and upvote. if it's a marketing stunt then just say so but don't ask me to believe she's genuine on blind faith, not after seeing all the scams that went on in the past few weeks.

I agree. This is lifestyle and culture writing with good photography. The identity of the writer isn't important. The only issue would be if it isn't original work, but I see no evidence of that.

she claims to be the girl in the pictures, as you can see also in her introduceyourself post:
https://steemit.com/life/@sweetsssj/how-do-girls-live-well-in-china
is identity theft not a serious issue? @anyx @cheetah
there's even a selfie in her intro. so if the identity of the writer is not the same as the girl taking the selfie then it's clear that the photographs are ripped form some social media.

What I'm saying is the context of this post makes the identity of the author irrelevant. It could be a fictional or semi-fictionalized character speaking in the first person (like Carrie from Sex and the City) and it would take nothing away from the post. Now if the pictures are ripped off, that's an issue. If there is identity theft that's an issue.

But for all you know the photos are the actual author, or are used with permission. Unless you have evidence to the contrary you are engaging in a witch hunt. Please stop.

You are certainly free to not vote for the post though, for whatever reason, if it doesn't appear compelling to you as adding value.

@smooth I agree. I don't support content theft or misleading people but some people spend so much time looking for plagiarism etc that could be better spent reading and upvoting high quality original content.