Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Let me see if I understood what you said. I suppose that if you go inside the train, you would activate the command so that 5 people don't die. Right?
I'm assuming that since you're only talking about the fat man's version. So, in the fat man's version, you are telling me that you would throw yourself instead of pushing the fat man? Interesting.
What terrorists are you talking about? All 5 people are innocent people.
Living with the burden of having killed a person must be very hard and even traumatic.
If it comes to saving someone we always judge by what we see/think. We never are really objective.
If it comes to just the title you used the answer is: yes.
Killing can also be a deed of love.
If it comes to family the answer is yes too.
If I can save someone by stepping in front of the train my answer is yes too. If I can push someone I can go myself too.
Case number one... I would not sacrifice 1 to save 5... By the way are these 5 all deaf too they cannot hear the train come?
The story is hard to believe.
Besides: the Sheppard cared more about the 1 (lost) lamb as all sheep's (does not make sense either).
💥💕
Posted using Partiko Android
Hahaha. Sorry, the real exercise tells about a psychopath who tied up all those people. They can not move.😅
I like the way you think 😉💕
So a psychopath tied 5 people up on the railroad and is watches/waits/asks me what choice I make?
Pushing him (the one person) and save those 5 (how fast is that train driving to untie these 5 in time?)...
Jumping in front of it myself and?
Psychopaths never can be trusted are (high) intelligent and easily fool people (including shrinks) and are charming.
Somehow the story does not make sense.
Thanks 💥💕
Posted using Partiko Android
Charming??? Oh my!
Remember me, where's the Stockholm Syndrome from?
I'm kidding! 😄
The situation is designed for you to make the obligatory decision to kill 1 or 5 people. They are exercises designed by philosophers and perhaps psychologists. Crazy people. 😜