just read your article jockey, interesting thoughts and information about the history of calenders I didn't know.
I don't really agree with some of the other points, especially that "moonlight has a different energy from sunlight" - simply because moonlight IS reflected sunlight. Anyways, interesting read and see you soon!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thank you very much mate! Upvoted and followed - I should have done it before! For your reference moonlight is cooling and sunlight is heating! Check it out online and also go and feel it for yourself or use a thermometer! =)
will check that. anyways, I got a little somth for you, I think inside it is red and white...
Geil! Upvoted that! =)
i had to come back my friend because your claim that moonlight cools is obviously a conspirancy theory and very much wrong. the internet is full of experiments "prooving" that, I know, but they are all subject to big errors. It is pure physics: moonlight doesnt really heat things because it is I think (i forgot the exact value) 10.000 times weaker than sun light. But it definitely doesnt cool anything either. Check this link for an explanation:
http://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog/index.cfm?postid=1590436706491009951
However, I like your thoughts about why the Gregorian calender was invented and about the advantages of the more natural moon calender. So this is not criticism of the entire article, only of the esoteric statement the moon had different light - it certainly does not.
I have always felt the energy was different between moonlight and sunlight since I was a child! I always feel warmer in the shadows at night... upvoted for doing some research! =)