Surveillance State: Stanford Researchers Use AI To Determine Neighborhood's Bias By Its Cars.
Some people want to figure out what makes human beings tick...while others seek to find ways they can become the time keepers. In the age of artificial intelligence, computer vision technology is leading the way in metadata analysis.
In this video
Dan Dicks of Press For Truth goes over the latest developments with this technology while explaining what the major issues will be moving forward.
Join Dan Dicks in Acapulco Mexico for the annual Anarchapulcho conference, get 10% off your tickets when you use promo code "PFT"
https://anarchapulco.com/buy-your-tickets/
Support Independent Media:
Bitcoin ➜ 13oNiHUNGn9vdfv7MT5kjwe7np9bwf5ccv
Ethereum ➜ 0xEce2AEf1F26373a00BDC7243d1201a98578CC67e
Patreon ➜ http://www.patreon.com/PressForTruth
Patreon Alternative ➜ https://pressfortruth.ca/donate
Paypal ➜ https://www.paypal.me/PressforTruth
I don't like ai, I find it creepy and invading but it's inevitable
"inevitable" seems like conceding defeat to something that is, at the moment, far less intelligent than a human. (well some / most humans any how :-) )
I think we still have an opportunity to control them.....if we are awake enough to see it.
I think he only means that the advent of general AI is inevitable. Not that we will be slaves to it.
Are you sure?
From some stuff I've read it seems many are asleep to the world around them. :-)
Hopefully you are correct .
Well, he does mention he does not like AI, so I think he understands that it poses a danger. But the fact that they will exist is inevitable. Whether we will be slaves to them or not, remains to be seen. They can be used as a tool of epic accuracy, but like any took, it can be used for good and bad.
I for one do not think they are the end of humankind, at least not yet. But I do think they should be used cautiously, and be made open source so as to not end up only in the wrong hands.
I agree that some people are oblivious, however, I don't think it's quite the case with the op
Agreed.
And you are correct re open source I think.
I have more trust these days in a mass consensus than I do anything else ATM
Well, I don't think mass-consensus is actually a thing. But whenever power is placed in the hand of very few people, they tend to become tyrants. And even if they do, there's only so much a handful of people can do, so making it open source will make it faster to spot issues and fix them. Probably why crowd-sourcing works so well now, taxis, hotels, content, politics, now money, hell, even gene sequencing... all much more successful when it's not planned top-down.
So, I'm definitely no commie, but I'm not an anarchist either, some general direction should still be maintained. Elon Musk's AI kinda follows this idea, so there's that :)
I have been thinking a lot about AI. Is it possible that AI invented Bitcoin as a step towards broadening its influence globally and eventually enslaving us? You know they say tech is at least 10 years ahead of what they are releasing publicly.
The whole Ai thing is visible right here on steem.
VoteBots will be followed by CommentBots which will be followed by AuthorBOTS.
We can all go to the beach!
On the other hand, recognizing AI, and deciding which if any BOTs we do or don't want, could put SOCIAL back into a SOCIAL site.
I say ban the bots here, no place for them on a SOCIAL site IMHO
Nice. Vote and follow me moexyn19 please. Thanks
I would add a new criteria...
if (noCar) { return democrat}RE: AI & Blockchain | https://steemit.com/blockchain/@archangelaudio/the-real-reason-for-the-blockchain
.
Congrats on getting engaged Dan!!
Congratulations on the engagement Dan!