If they did land on the moon the evidence would still be there on the moon surface, not too much to ask for the evidence in 2017?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If they did land on the moon the evidence would still be there on the moon surface, not too much to ask for the evidence in 2017?
Here a list of third party accounts of Moon landings. Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings is evidence, or analysis of evidence, about Moon landings that does not come from either NASA or the U.S. government (the first party), or the Apollo Moon landing hoax theorists (the second party).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
There were just way too many people involved in these missions to keep a fake of this magnitude a secret. People just cannot keep secrets.
it's very compartmentalized. Few people would have to actually know, telemetry is very easy to fake. Especially back in the 60's
People tend to keep secrets when their career, pension or even life depends on it, either way it is an emotive topic for many.
The Russians monitored every single move the US made and still make. Their participation in the space race was genuine and they'd have been the first to scream 'fake', both then & now. They tracked the US missions there and back.
Good luck using logic with these wackjobs.
Just like they did with 9/11 ??
Why not speak out at the end of their lives?
maybe that's why the rumors been out for so long- somebody involved didn't keep it a secret...