I'll say it again. She was being deceitful when she went on to say then there's something about insurance. She knew what the insurance thing was. That's being deceitful. It didn't fit her agenda. She didn't even have to add it. She could have done that to my account but I would have gotten it back because she had no justifiable reason to do so. Just like she had no business dragging her buddy from information wars into it who had no problem with me posting stuff for another author and giving her the SBD because she suffers from Lupus and she can't handle having two websites to manage. She gave me permission to publish her stuff on here and it's been verified by Steemcleaners but not until her buddy took every last cent earned by flagging the stuff including the earnings that came from others not in information wars, taking money away from a ill person, yeah, that speaks volumes for the person you speak of. She's the kind of person whose own vendetta against child protection services would rather see thousands to millions of kids suffer at the abuse of parental hands then to ever say there was a need for such a service. That's the type of person we are talking about because she never ever once has rewarded any positive reflection of cps that I've ever seen. There are those of us out here who have had positive interactions including myself and a niece who will tell you their intervention and her subsequent adoption helped her dodge a bullet. She couldn't be more grateful. There is bad in every group in society, it doesn't matter who it is, there is also a whole lot of good that comes out of many groups also, she is a negative naysayer. All children must suffer because CPS may make a mistake, that's just wrong. Now I am done with this conversation so no need to reply back.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Oh for the love of....you really don't get it. So you're right, this conversation is over.