I disagree. Criminals bent on murder can demand any interpretation of lawful they want, but justice will not be bent to their purposes. The blood of their victims cries out today, and will be answered whether genocidal psychopaths like it or not.
There's a perceived proportion of people who are on a path to stymie or constrain the conversation into a particular direction. They do it to make the endeavor more complicated to solve and in some instances, probably in even more instances than not, lead individuals down a path to be ridiculed. This just compounds or adds additional barriers those individuals have to go through to prove something. Trying to prove harms is one of those topics. Much more difficult to prove, can delay the process for years. Proving fraud is instantaneous at this point because it's been proven the vaccines switch up and individuals immune response, they do not create immunity, another fraud, they do not stop transmission, another fraud. Once that frauds been established legally you can argue the harms that have been done. Up to and including causing individuals immune systems not only do not stop the individual from getting the disease, spreading the disease it makes it impossible for them to ward off any disease, infection or illness sufficiently they may catch moving forward. As for those with compromised immune systems or inflictions of other illnesses it leads to taxing an already burdened immune system causing yet even more harms or deaths.
If you'd like me to give you a motive that is non conspiratorial proof is the amounts of monies it cost governments when people get ill, monies in medical cost, social program cost to take care of them and lost productions. I can even link that move not only from a government intent of such a proposed proposition but to Pfizer also if you go read what you describe as my near worthless dribble here: https://hive.blog/deepdives/@sunlit7/covid-deaths-and-the-economic-factor. But like I said there's certain individuals that'd rather guide people into a more difficult path to reach that which would reach the same conclusion in the end, the vaccines caused harms and deaths. The immune switch is proven, what avenue they took to manage that switch was done with using the proapoptotic cells which are categorically (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc., ) aligned for distribution into various parts of the body, which is why the shot caused distribution through out the body and didn't stay in the arm as promoted, another fraud.
No, I'm not. Any deflection from the responsibility of those corrupt traitors disregards their culpability in the genocidal crimes they directly contributed to.
That's blatantly false. He was but one of myriad conspirators that are all individually responsible for their personal actions. Nothing exculpates Trump of his guilt, but nothing exculpates any of them.
Approval is just a part or parcel of the tasks at hand. The FDA didn't invent the vaccine or the virus for that matter. It was the FDA's responsibility to look at the data and transcript a safety data sheet which was denied to them by threats made not only by Trump in a tweet but others who Trump directed to get the message across to the FDA they wanted approval and they wanted it the very next day or else. If they had had time to transcribe the data it may have made a decision more difficult for thousands of doctors to give the populace these shots willy nilly as a whole had they have known what the potential consequences would have been to many. Had people had access to the data safety sheets themselves may have also made a vast difference in their decision to get the shots. That all happened in Dec 2020, Trump knew he was running out of time, he was brought in as a hit man, it was his job to get the vaccine out. It was never intended for Trump to stay in office after the roll out, they needed a mentally compromised individual to take the fall. An individual that also could be used to lead people into believing a falsehood that they were dealing with an inept individual instead of a corrupt criminal enterprise. Each step was masterfully crafted and each step has to be masterfully taken down, raising your finger and pointing in just one direction while calling squirrel is just making the endeavor much more difficult. But like I said there are many out there deliberately misleading people obscuring the optics.
There's no point in discussing things with you if you just make up things to argue that I didn't say, and do not respond to things I do.
It may just be the way you word stuff that people can easily take offense at.
First, because of incorrect formatting, the comment I am replying to implies you are quoting me when you say "I responded plenty, you just don't like it..." and so on. Please be more attentive to formatting to avoid my misunderstanding what you mean.
Second, you say "I called what you had to say basically the same dribble..."
No, that's not what you did say. You may have meant to say that. What you did, in fact, was to misquote me as having described your words as "...near worthless dribble...", which I did not do.
Because you're missformatting, missquoting, and mistaking the specific words I write it is impossible for me to sort what you mean from what you write in response. I am left with the marked sense that this indicates you have misunderstood me. However, because you do not precisely and specifically differentiate between what I did say, what you understood me to say, nor even what you mean to say in response, I cannot tell what you mean to say.
It's true I don't like that, but not because I don't like whatever you meant by it. I don't like it because I can't TELL what you meant by it. That also makes it utterly pointless to try to discuss it with you, because I can't even tell whatever it is you're trying to say.
Did you ever stop to consider when writing a response the same thing applies from your comments to me.