Sort:  

It may just be the way you word stuff that people can easily take offense at.

but I doubt I miss much.
People can take that in more than one way.
I responded plenty, you just don't like it I called what you had to say basically the same dribble they've been pouring out repeatedly just saying it in a different context. They put it out there, everyone runs for it, post it up, people click on the blaring new headline only to realize it's stuff we basically already know or, as in the case of the surgeon taken out of context.

First, because of incorrect formatting, the comment I am replying to implies you are quoting me when you say "I responded plenty, you just don't like it..." and so on. Please be more attentive to formatting to avoid my misunderstanding what you mean.

Second, you say "I called what you had to say basically the same dribble..."

No, that's not what you did say. You may have meant to say that. What you did, in fact, was to misquote me as having described your words as "...near worthless dribble...", which I did not do.

Because you're missformatting, missquoting, and mistaking the specific words I write it is impossible for me to sort what you mean from what you write in response. I am left with the marked sense that this indicates you have misunderstood me. However, because you do not precisely and specifically differentiate between what I did say, what you understood me to say, nor even what you mean to say in response, I cannot tell what you mean to say.

It's true I don't like that, but not because I don't like whatever you meant by it. I don't like it because I can't TELL what you meant by it. That also makes it utterly pointless to try to discuss it with you, because I can't even tell whatever it is you're trying to say.

I can't TELL what you meant by it

Did you ever stop to consider when writing a response the same thing applies from your comments to me.