I don't know Jeff, I usually take a lot of contrarian views with a grain of salt.
It just seems that you're stirring the pot without adding much to the conversation.
If you break things down to a simplistic logic template, such as:
Did I personally witness this, or participate in this
If not, then its all a lie
Then a lot of things become "lies" in short order. Luckily, logic and other tools can help, but if you're building an argument on the basis of not having personally vetted the events -- you're going to discount every tertiary event that has happened in human history.
For instance, I know in your videos you state often that Mexico isn't dangerous, and specifically Acapulco as a city being "safe".
Based on your logic, I haven't been there or can verify it personally, so you must be lying to me.
I could easily make the argument that since you live in a gated community away from the city center, where villas rent for easily $800 USD a day or more that your viewpoint is flawed.
Again, you can believe what you'd like, but given the method you use to arrive at your conclusions - most of what exists would instantly be fake or a "lie" to you.
That just doesn't make much sense to me.