I can see your point, and I actually agree with it. Today people, for the most part, have not realized the world has transformed in very fundamental ways. People mostly seem to think that significant change hasn't happened yet, and to expect nothing to happen, like always, because business will be handled by business handlers, as they always are. They're also partly right, because it will continue to change, and the point at which they realize they shouldn't have left their fate up to their handlers will be when they're long past the point of no return. They will have been wrong about nothing significant happening.
"If we are to deconstruct centralization and build anew, how many will dispel the box they have subjugated themselves to, wittingly or unwittingly so?"
All people will, willingly or unwillingly. Farmers have no seed, nor feed for their animals. As shelves bare across the West, their exigency will dawn on folks, and they will raise a great clamor for someone to solve the problem. Their real problem will be that it's not a problem at all, but the solution to the problem they are. Before they starve, flee, or resign themselves to the camps, they will consider undertaking handling their own business. Most will dismiss this thought as inconvenient, and the normalcy bias will claim another victim. It will claim lots of victims.
They do not believe in conspiracies. They don't believe in the Georgia Guidestones, UN Agenda 2030, or in the raving ranters that have been warning them for years. I reckon them as will take action already are, and them as won't, well, they won't matter. They won't be part of the problem for long.
They'll have been handled. The rest of us will be dodging drones, and dying. But we'll be providing our own goods and services then, because they won't be coming from China, or on trucks, or by rail, except for those that accept the jabs and the bugpods they come with. But they will be GMOs, wholly owned by their masters, and won't be people anymore, by law. They'll be property. Maybe Klaus Schwab will have been right about them, and they'll be fine with it.
We'll see.
I'm sure there have always been thieves, thugs, and petty overlords. But without agriculture there was no excess wealth to feed armies with, and when drones are 'capturing carbon' we won't be gardening. Folks will need to defend one another from the drones, and will happily ensure the folks that have their back can keep on having their back, and in time standard procedures for preventing thieves, thugs, and petty overlords will develop. It's pretty simple, really. Thieves and thugs have no appetites for fair fights.
I'd sure rather be wrong. I hope, a lot, that I am.
Thanks!