I think it's fairly straightforward, if not particularly aesthetically formatted.
As to CRISPR, if there are transfections of DNA, those transfections can be removed via CRISPR. There are multiple Cas mechanisms by which CRISPR can operate, literally thousands of different Cas systems various bacteria have devised, most of which mere humans haven't even begun to understand.
If there is any claim made that jab victims aren't human because of such transfections, removing them should eliminate any potential validity of any such claim. Further, if there is any claim that the transfected owe patent holders because of the involuntary transfections, removing the transfections eliminates any validity to any such claim - and also any harm or hazard such transfections may threaten.
Harms and hazards effected by the jabs that do not involve transfecting DNA need to be dealt with appropriately, which CRISPR is likely not the proper mechanism for.