You've done excellent research into Lieber, IIRC, and such development is exactly what I refer to above being all but impossible to test in live people by any other mechanism than the jabs, albeit covertly and criminally.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There was a few years ago reports that they had come up with the technology to be able to track schizophrenia patients as to if they were taking their meds on time. Such a technology that they could remotely monitor these patients living independent was from having digested pills. Its been a few years since I read an article on it. When all the accusations of metal shapes being found in people's bodies from the jabs I tried looking for it but couldn't find it.
You want solid proof you say you can't find, I have it via the horses mouth, I believe it was the Astra Zeneca head I wrote in one of my ops that openly admitted that the mRNA was capable of sending messages to the body. I'll see if I can find which op over the next couple days, get the exact quote, it was a guy from Cyrus and himself who were overjoyed by this new technology, why wouldn't they be considering it could be used as a bioweapon for attack on western civilization.
That's been invented long ago. It's called 'medication time' when patients are given their meds by nurses.
In fact mRNA is a message to the body. It's instructions on how to build proteins. Now, if you can get a message to send a message, you'd have something else besides mRNA. It's getting pretty recursive, though.
Noubar Afeyan explains the promise of messenger RNA by comparing it to the more controversial concept of changing an individuals DNA. He notes changes to the DNA can be essentially permanent, like hardware. By contrast messenger RNA is more like software: it can be used to perform a task and then can be programmed to disappear.
Wow, lookie there Ralph, two messages in one shot. Eat your words.
You eat them. You're putting them in my mouth. Doing a job is what mRNA does, and disappear is what things do when they're done. You're getting senile or summat.
Go look at Liebers patents, it can distinguish differences in cells, so it has to be a multiple messenger.
Multiple messengers is entirely certain. Myriad formulations were tested. Every lot had a differing injury rate. That's because every lot was a different formulation, a different mix of medical devices being tested.