I still don't understand why the Islamist are so disposed to violence, no other religion is that extreme. And yes, the European union should be more stringent with their immigration laws.
They have a mission to proselytise and therefore they cannot tolerate criticism because they think it would bring down their mission (for their God). Especially as the rally is criticising political Islam and they can't even separate the two and then something like this comes out of it.
They sure have a weird way of going about it!
Yes, he's missing a few horsepower in his head.
!PIZZA
🤣
🤣!LUV
The mission to proselytise is one that certain Christian sects are taking very seriously (by 'Christian Sect' I mean they derive their bellief system from the Bible). I lived in an area where Mormons and Jehovas Witnesses were almost daily at the doors in the neighborhood, knocking. Never once did I hear any of them getting violent, even when they are treated rudely.
The area I lived for a long time was in the southern part of Western Canada, referred to as the Bible Belt. A church on every corner, almost. Anglican, Catholic, Protestants, Born Again Christians of various stripes and colors, all of them had a mission to proselytise, particularly the Born Again Christians, who even dared to go to Islamist countries to preach the Bible - that didn't go too well for many of them. What I am trying to say here is that the only ones given to violence are the Islamists. Before someone mentions Sikhs, yes, the males wear a ceremonial dagger (Kirpan), which is a sign of their faith, but of those that lived in Canada, I never heard of any of them to agressively attack anyone. Already in 2006 the courts ruled that Kirpans as a religious symbol are allowed. Much later, Queensland Australia Surpreme Court dealt with the same issue 2023, overturning a ban. Neither Canada nor Australia has any history of Sikhs running around knifing people, like what is happening here with the radical Islamists. And what I learn from the Wikipedia article about the Kirpan, instances of violence involving Kirpans are very rare.
Thank you for your message and the relevant information. But I have nothing to do with cults, on the contrary, I gave a JW a clearer view and thus helped him out of the cult... My humble self was searching for the truth, of course I went through countless aberrations, feints and lies, but since God is spirit and the Bible is his earthly written word, you have a good point of reference to use the Bible as historical, genealogical and archaeological evidence rather than a religious book with a tendency towards sectarianism.
Especially since the Bible was never about religion in the modern sense. And the JWs were founded by a Freemason, and the etymology means something really nasty.
Don't worry, I think I understand very well, with God's help, what I am researching, and you can read a lot on my blog about how it is never about proselytising or religion, but about biblical, genealogical, etymological and archaeological evidence of this world and what there is to discover.
Especially as I could already see the words of Jesus in the now before I even picked up the Bible. Have a good time and keep an eye out for Cananite tricks, Masonic structures and psyeudo spirituals.
My point was that among those that proselytise, whatever religion or cult that may be, the Islamists (we are talking about) are the only ones that are consistently violent.
I am not into discussing Heresies, there are libraries full of one and the other accusing each other of being heretics. Bible studies are a slippery slope and should not be attempted by amateurs. Why do I say that? Because my academic path included Anthropology (both cultural and social), and as a side I also did Religious Studies (and assisted one of the Professors in writing his book). Most sources searched out by amateurs are 'amateurish' and not considered reliable and useful for academic studies. Again, many of those that are supposed to be 'serious' sources are but taken out of context to use as a club to beat the opposition - again, as I said before, books about heresies are a dime a dozen, and in those so called 'religious bookstores' you find mostly junk of the worse kind. .... and Charles Russell was an amateur that founded the 'Russellites' out of a amateur Bible studies class, later known as Jehovas. The supposed 'connection' of Russell with the Freemasons is a red herring believed by some conspiracy theorists of the time, since once he spoke at a masonic temple (1913). But there are no records of him ever being a freemason. References to pyramid power have nothing to do with the masons and are found among many esoteric and new age movements. Heck, there are those that even take David Icke serious #facepalm
The best way to sort out the rubbish is to do your research at the library of an accredited and reputable academic institution.
Then you are a really great student and certainly know a lot about what you are writing.
I think God has always called amateurs who didn't have such great promotional status because amateurs didn't lack humility to mature true fruit in ministry.
Who knows, you will surely know what is right and wrong. Have a good day and study the system diligently.