Thank's a lot for your enriching answer, that as always acts in me as a high stimulant to write.
High quality commenting like this, should guide Steemit, and
musing is an effective boom for the vision and strategy of Steemit, and a lesson to follow.
I've been writing a mini-essay on Steemit, about the dialectics of self-liberation, using anarchism, existentialism, and decentralism, and the deeper I go the more I feel that all the paths lead to the same goal of individuals less dependent on reality constraints and parameters.
In the first place, we must get off the common sense conception of anarchy as chaos, because it is the best method to get a constant social equilibrium, and I see actual chaos as generated by centralized power,
The Open-source "conspiration" was the pillar of the blockchain and is one of the biggest revolutions in human thought and action because for the first time a technology has a sociological implication made possible by the concept of decentralization that is the inner deep dream of any anarchist, activist or individualist.
The question of trust for the real anarchist is that weight of responsibility that replaces any social contract.
I believe that anarchy, the search for our inner-self, and decentralization are today working on the blockchain as a technology that made it practically possible, and that will lead a confluence of values y similarities in the goals.
"The philosophy of decentralism is mainly associated with libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism, but it is against centralism, opposing the results of free trade, which will lead to the exploitation and abuse of human rights, which is a common result of centralization. "
Decentralism is kind of libertarianism opposed to exploitation in a non-free market, using monopolistic dominance.
The concept of decentralization in the blockchain is not the same of the theoretical pre-movements because it was born with a technology attached to a supra-theory of total decentralism, the wish of any anarchist, individualist, and activist, that will show as the way to re-empower ourselves against the constraints of centralized institutions.
Marxism’s commitment to “centralism” gave birth to the communist totalitarian state capitalism, by the total concentration of power over free will, the points of view anarchist and decentralism want to fight
"Anarchism and Existentialism have the common points of refusing centralized authority, but the former believe power corrupts people and the latter believe that people corrupt power and themselves with the norms and we must always be vigilant to eliminate their influence."
Hi, and thanks a lot for your added-value and motivating comment
The big problem with the concept of anarchism is totally built by society's propaganda and the perfect scapegoat to sacrifice, when centralized, imperialist/colonialist create chaos in the world.
The common sense and media mainstream give an example for anarchy the Somalia chaos, assassinations, destruction, social unrest, inequality, and wars are the attributes of actual hegemonic imperialist capitalism, and not for Anarchy that it is the only solution to fix it.
So propaganda calls Anarchy the chaos imperialist powers generate, like the example of a mob ruled ochlarchy (mobs power) happening in Somalia today.
Decentralization of power is the best form of unstable equilibrium in the social order and the end of wars.
Decentralism will be the science of implementation of decentralized consensus mechanisms at the technically and collective social decision making.
Anarchy is being responsible for our acts.
Anarchy makes a gun out of our conscience, and that's why there is no place for activists based in taking power by force or use organized violence by collective groups ( peaceful Occupy and strikes are not violence) because extreme behaviors only feed the strengthing of the System and reinforce its authority.
View this answer on Musing.io
Thank's a lot for your enriching answer, that as always acts in me as a high stimulant to write.
High quality commenting like this, should guide Steemit, and
musing is an effective boom for the vision and strategy of Steemit, and a lesson to follow.
I've been writing a mini-essay on Steemit, about the dialectics of self-liberation, using anarchism, existentialism, and decentralism, and the deeper I go the more I feel that all the paths lead to the same goal of individuals less dependent on reality constraints and parameters.
In the first place, we must get off the common sense conception of anarchy as chaos, because it is the best method to get a constant social equilibrium, and I see actual chaos as generated by centralized power,
The Open-source "conspiration" was the pillar of the blockchain and is one of the biggest revolutions in human thought and action because for the first time a technology has a sociological implication made possible by the concept of decentralization that is the inner deep dream of any anarchist, activist or individualist.
The question of trust for the real anarchist is that weight of responsibility that replaces any social contract.
I believe that anarchy, the search for our inner-self, and decentralization are today working on the blockchain as a technology that made it practically possible, and that will lead a confluence of values y similarities in the goals.
"The philosophy of decentralism is mainly associated with libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism, but it is against centralism, opposing the results of free trade, which will lead to the exploitation and abuse of human rights, which is a common result of centralization. "
Decentralism is kind of libertarianism opposed to exploitation in a non-free market, using monopolistic dominance.
The concept of decentralization in the blockchain is not the same of the theoretical pre-movements because it was born with a technology attached to a supra-theory of total decentralism, the wish of any anarchist, individualist, and activist, that will show as the way to re-empower ourselves against the constraints of centralized institutions.
Marxism’s commitment to “centralism” gave birth to the communist totalitarian state capitalism, by the total concentration of power over free will, the points of view anarchist and decentralism want to fight
"Anarchism and Existentialism have the common points of refusing centralized authority, but the former believe power corrupts people and the latter believe that people corrupt power and themselves with the norms and we must always be vigilant to eliminate their influence."
I will stop here before writing a book... hehe
Thanks
View this answer on Musing.io
Hi, and thanks a lot for your added-value and motivating comment
The big problem with the concept of anarchism is totally built by society's propaganda and the perfect scapegoat to sacrifice, when centralized, imperialist/colonialist create chaos in the world.
The common sense and media mainstream give an example for anarchy the Somalia chaos, assassinations, destruction, social unrest, inequality, and wars are the attributes of actual hegemonic imperialist capitalism, and not for Anarchy that it is the only solution to fix it.
So propaganda calls Anarchy the chaos imperialist powers generate, like the example of a mob ruled ochlarchy (mobs power) happening in Somalia today.
Decentralization of power is the best form of unstable equilibrium in the social order and the end of wars.
Decentralism will be the science of implementation of decentralized consensus mechanisms at the technically and collective social decision making.
Anarchy is being responsible for our acts.
Anarchy makes a gun out of our conscience, and that's why there is no place for activists based in taking power by force or use organized violence by collective groups ( peaceful Occupy and strikes are not violence) because extreme behaviors only feed the strengthing of the System and reinforce its authority.