Yes, that tells you the exact opposite of what you claimed. When anyone votes on the 0 minute mark, 100 % of the rewards goes to the author, so of course it's beneficial to vote for yourself as soon as possible. However, if you vote for someone else, then it's best to wait until 30 minutes has passed, so you get maximum curation reward.
In the upcoming hardfork, this will be changed, and at this point it's most beneficial to vote for yourself at the 15 minute mark. At that point you get 100 % of the rewards for your upvote.
No worries! Everyone can make mistakes, and I just wanted to correct it so that people don't believe that they will not gain anything by upvoting themselves.
I think I read it in the steamblog update.
it is an unfair advantage for users who curate thier own content when posting and stuff.
https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/blockchain-update-3-hardfork-20-and-release-19-4-appbase-statsd-and-rocksdb
Yes, that tells you the exact opposite of what you claimed. When anyone votes on the 0 minute mark, 100 % of the rewards goes to the author, so of course it's beneficial to vote for yourself as soon as possible. However, if you vote for someone else, then it's best to wait until 30 minutes has passed, so you get maximum curation reward.
In the upcoming hardfork, this will be changed, and at this point it's most beneficial to vote for yourself at the 15 minute mark. At that point you get 100 % of the rewards for your upvote.
Sorry for the mistake. Stay in touch.
No worries! Everyone can make mistakes, and I just wanted to correct it so that people don't believe that they will not gain anything by upvoting themselves.
thanks for pointing out.