Hi, @v4vapid is a friend, @Suzi3d is a long time friend from Occupy days and is an asylum seeker in Russia (we also worked at www.wearechange.org together in 2016), @elizbethleavos also a friend, as is Lauri Love.. @caitlinjohnstone is also a new friend. Yes, your questions are insulting them you are witch hunting saying everyone is apart of some giant Russian conspiracy.
I understand you don't understand that but it is absolutely insulting I dealt with being called Russian by Louise Mensch and ProporNot I was even accused of being @LukeWeAreChange. I am American I just choose to keep my anonymity a little more than most. Why? Because real journalism and muckraking is a dangerous job as has been proven with the deaths of my Friend Judith Poe's daughter Serena Shim, Christopher Story, Danny Casolaro and Michael Hastings.
I am sorry to hear you were gang stalked you may want to actually look into who @Suzi3d is and see what she went through and documented with her film on gangstalking Diary of a Person of Interest - by Kiwi journalist & FBI target Suzie Dawson:
The people you are attacking myself included are some of the most targeted individuals alive right now.
I hope you actually get to know the people mentioned above who you have bashed as "disinformation agents" because they are all very real people.
As for your own article I would love to see what you come up with.. most of what I write are leaks of information included in the stories somewhere or another. I cite everything I write and vet sources because I care about credibility and maintaining that.
Thanks, AK.
I asked suzie directly about her experiences, I was truly curious, but she sent me links that were broken and said i had to watch the youtube videos. Then she got really angry and called me names. That did not impress me at all. None of her story makes any sense at all.
I don't see any of suzie's actual work from NZ showing her doing anything, at all actually. Just being with the internet party doesn't mean much to me, it would seem with someone like kim dotcom they should at least be funded and able to provide for their own security. None of it makes any sense. And then they rejected my request for open dialogue, multiple times. The only response I have gotten back from them, at all, have been attacks on my character. No consideration of my work, no functioning links.
Can you see how their latest post of adam carter, where he writes these huge non technical essays about the fine points of 'fancy bear' whatever, yet overlooks the huge pile of evidence regarding russian fb and twitter paid buys?
I am not saying that lauri love is suspect, I believe in her work and follow her story, I just find it very odd, (don't you?) that broze, his bud damon, suzie, caitlin, ms vos, and a bunch of other accounts all wrote nearly identical but differently worded posts about it on the same day.
I'm not 100% about anything anymore, but if no one can see where I'm coming from, which I have explained at length with screenshots in my blog, then it just looks like you're not real.
I have taken a new strategy where I am just muting anything that drops below the 50% credibility mark. As for broze and kenny, they don't seem to understand anarchy, at all whatsoever. broze's last response to me was that 'nobody cares what i think' which is something an anarchist never has any place to say, as everyone's ideas are on the same level unless you are invoking authority. Kenny said 'anarchy is just doing what you want solong as nobody gets hurt' and that''s just wrong.
I know it may look like I just started doing stuff because I also am doing the semi-anon thing, but I have been an activist and loud for years. I have a personal blog and twitter in my own name, anti-drug war, BDS, peace, occupy, I was at the FTAA protest in 2002 which was not easy. I don't see any of broze or suzie or disobedient media doing anything that is that risky, and compared to what I have posted in privacy workshop alone, the entire site of disobedient media pales in comparison. Plus I find a lot of trump apologism there.
So I'll ask you what I asked vapid before I muted him, you really don't see where I'm coming from here? Really? I could believe someone who thought I was wrong or missing something, but someone who dismisses all of these points completely is simply not credible in my eyes. And I'd have to mute you :(