Hi,
I just got finished reading your mkultra article, really excellent work. I am putting together a long post on the 'hearing voices' phenomenon that I find franky all over crime reports in the united states.
I wanted to let you know that my last round of investigation unfortunately uncovered a shill nest here on steemit, and you have been resteeming them. Your work has been of such a quality, you are on of a handful of users who I think may just be fooled by them and not part of them.
v4vapid is some sort of ringleader, the conscious resistance and kennyskitchen are cops, disobedient media and suzie3d are pure disinfo I don't know from where, caitlinjohnstone and clarityofsignal are probably involved.
Everyone who talked about lauri love as if on queue last week, everyone who resteemed everything about disobedient media and 'adam carter', they are all part of it.
It could be russian, it could be pro trump forces in the fbi or cia, but these people are not who they say they are ie anarchists or journalists or politicians. I gave them every chance to explain themselves and they just insulted me and acted like my critical questions were somehow insulting them.
Because I think you are human and because I verified your mkultra essay is original and accurate, I thought I would give you the heads up.
But anyone who continues to operate in that circle with suzie3d and disobedient media, I will have to mute.
All comments welcome.
The main work I have done on steemit is privacy workshop, of which I am quite proud. But I was also given drugs by government agents of some kind last year on at least 2 occasions and was followed, having numerous bizarre encounters with law enforcement that seem to have known I was going to be where I was headed ahead of time, ie national parks, campgrounds, wal mart parking lots, grocery stores, etc. I have yet to encounter anyone on steemit who seems to grasp the significance of what I saw, most of the accounts I encounter could easily be bots/shills.
So, I reach out to people I think are human and independent.
I will post my hearing voices analysis later today, I would appreciate your comments.
Thanks, peace, @mindhawk
Hi, @v4vapid is a friend, @Suzi3d is a long time friend from Occupy days and is an asylum seeker in Russia (we also worked at www.wearechange.org together in 2016), @elizbethleavos also a friend, as is Lauri Love.. @caitlinjohnstone is also a new friend. Yes, your questions are insulting them you are witch hunting saying everyone is apart of some giant Russian conspiracy.
I understand you don't understand that but it is absolutely insulting I dealt with being called Russian by Louise Mensch and ProporNot I was even accused of being @LukeWeAreChange. I am American I just choose to keep my anonymity a little more than most. Why? Because real journalism and muckraking is a dangerous job as has been proven with the deaths of my Friend Judith Poe's daughter Serena Shim, Christopher Story, Danny Casolaro and Michael Hastings.
I am sorry to hear you were gang stalked you may want to actually look into who @Suzi3d is and see what she went through and documented with her film on gangstalking Diary of a Person of Interest - by Kiwi journalist & FBI target Suzie Dawson:
The people you are attacking myself included are some of the most targeted individuals alive right now.
I hope you actually get to know the people mentioned above who you have bashed as "disinformation agents" because they are all very real people.
As for your own article I would love to see what you come up with.. most of what I write are leaks of information included in the stories somewhere or another. I cite everything I write and vet sources because I care about credibility and maintaining that.
Thanks, AK.
I asked suzie directly about her experiences, I was truly curious, but she sent me links that were broken and said i had to watch the youtube videos. Then she got really angry and called me names. That did not impress me at all. None of her story makes any sense at all.
I don't see any of suzie's actual work from NZ showing her doing anything, at all actually. Just being with the internet party doesn't mean much to me, it would seem with someone like kim dotcom they should at least be funded and able to provide for their own security. None of it makes any sense. And then they rejected my request for open dialogue, multiple times. The only response I have gotten back from them, at all, have been attacks on my character. No consideration of my work, no functioning links.
Can you see how their latest post of adam carter, where he writes these huge non technical essays about the fine points of 'fancy bear' whatever, yet overlooks the huge pile of evidence regarding russian fb and twitter paid buys?
I am not saying that lauri love is suspect, I believe in her work and follow her story, I just find it very odd, (don't you?) that broze, his bud damon, suzie, caitlin, ms vos, and a bunch of other accounts all wrote nearly identical but differently worded posts about it on the same day.
I'm not 100% about anything anymore, but if no one can see where I'm coming from, which I have explained at length with screenshots in my blog, then it just looks like you're not real.
I have taken a new strategy where I am just muting anything that drops below the 50% credibility mark. As for broze and kenny, they don't seem to understand anarchy, at all whatsoever. broze's last response to me was that 'nobody cares what i think' which is something an anarchist never has any place to say, as everyone's ideas are on the same level unless you are invoking authority. Kenny said 'anarchy is just doing what you want solong as nobody gets hurt' and that''s just wrong.
I know it may look like I just started doing stuff because I also am doing the semi-anon thing, but I have been an activist and loud for years. I have a personal blog and twitter in my own name, anti-drug war, BDS, peace, occupy, I was at the FTAA protest in 2002 which was not easy. I don't see any of broze or suzie or disobedient media doing anything that is that risky, and compared to what I have posted in privacy workshop alone, the entire site of disobedient media pales in comparison. Plus I find a lot of trump apologism there.
So I'll ask you what I asked vapid before I muted him, you really don't see where I'm coming from here? Really? I could believe someone who thought I was wrong or missing something, but someone who dismisses all of these points completely is simply not credible in my eyes. And I'd have to mute you :(