don’t they sell drugs out in Potomac and Springfield, and places like that?
Do they sell drugs out of there or into there?
Yeah of course, but there are two reasons they don't go after them, one is that those people have lawyers and so will be hard/ expensive to try to convict and the other is that those folks in the suburbs are not having shootouts in the street every day. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, if there are lots of murders in your neighborhood there will be lots of cops there. Should they ignore those neighborhoods with murders caused by drug gangs to go after upper class people for drugs just to be fair?
they should go after those people for the murders...and not go after anyone for the drugs
In most cases they are the same people and the murders are because of the drugs. The reason they buy guns in the first place is to protect their drugs and drug turf. Then murders ensue. The only actual solution is to end prohibition and then all drugs will be sold at stores and not by criminals with guns on street corners. Walgreens and CVS sell billions of dollars worth of opiates across the street from one another and their employees never have shootouts do they?
If the crips and bloods could actually do the same then the block would not be hot. But of course they can't because they are not regulated like Walgreens and CVS. Nothing brings the cops around like a homicide.
I agree its the black market that is causing the crime, and thats why I think we should legalize the drugs and stop arresting people for them
arresting people for drugs because it might lead to murder is very similar to pre-crime
most of these problems are caused by prohibition
I am ok with people getting arrested for directly hurting someone, but not for carrying inanimate objects like drugs or guns
as for the argument that it is harmful to sell an addict drugs...drug users make their own decisions, and no one is responsible for those decisions but themselves, and i say that as drug user lol
If i drop dead from drugs someday its my own fault lol
Not arresting them because it might lead to murder, arresting them for drugs after it has lead to constant murders in certain neighborhoods. It's not precrime after the crimes have been committed. That is called good police work.
If we believe the claim that there are drug dealers in every neighborhood at the same rate, despite that being a false assumption based on rates of usage in various populations, then it would make sense to target the neighborhoods were violent crime is a problem and ignore the ones where it is not.
It's not harmful to sell an addict drugs, it is harmful to sell anyone random unknown, unlabeled, inconsistent and deadly substances intended for human injection.
As a drug user I am sure if you had a choice between buying your drugs at 7-11 or behind it, and the prices were similar, you would buy the labeled, clean and consistent product in the 7-11.
If 7-11 sold you a slim jim and it had botulism in it and you died wouldn't it be their fault to some degree?
Then how is a drug dealer selling you baby laxative and fentanyl and calling it heroin not putting them at fault to some degree when you die?
you do raise some fair points at the end there, in those extreme cases I guess there must be some type of responsibility for their product. But I think we both agree that the ultimate long-term solution is to legalize drugs and bring them onto the legal market instead of throwing more people in cages.
Indeed, we need to free up space for cyber criminals.